CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING
Accuracy of Multislice Computed Tomography in the Preoperative Assessment of Coronary Disease in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis
Martine Gilard, MD*,*,
Jean-Christophe Cornily, MD*,
Pierre-Yves Pennec, MD*,
Cedric Joret*,
Grégoire Le Gal, MD ,
Jacques Mansourati, MD*,
Jean-Jacques Blanc, MD* and
Jacques Boschat, MD*
* Department of Cardiology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
EA 3878 and the Department of Internal Medicine, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Manuscript received July 18, 2005;
revised manuscript received November 28, 2005,
accepted November 30, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Martine Gilard, Department of Cardiology, La Cavale Blanche Hospital, 29609 Brest Cedex, France. (Email: martine.gilard{at}chu-brest.fr).
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate multislice computed tomography (MSCT) as an alternative to coronary angiography, we prospectively studied its diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary artery lesions in patients with significant aortic valve stenosis undergoing valve surgery.
BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic valve stenosis, coronary angiography is still recommended before surgery. Multislice computed tomography is a promising noninvasive technique for the detection of significant coronary artery lesions.
METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients scheduled for coronary angiography in the preoperative assessment of aortic valve stenosis underwent 16-slice MSCT 24 h before coronary angiography. We analyzed coronary lesions, image quality, and arterial calcium score.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the MSCT-based strategy in detecting significant stenosis was 100%, and its specificity 80%. The positive and negative predictive values were respectively 55% and 100%. For calcium scores <1,000 (77% of patients), MSCT detected all patients without coronary artery disease, enabling conventional coronary angiography to be avoided in 35 of 55 cases (80%). For calcium scores >1,000, MSCT enabled conventional coronary angiography to be avoided in only 6% of cases, either because significant stenosis was found with a possible indication of revascularization, or because the examination was not interpretable.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this initial experience in relatively few patients suggest that MSCT-based coronary angiography may serve as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography to rule out significant coronary artery disease in patients scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement. Larger studies are necessary to fully explore the potential of coronary MSCT to improve preoperative risk stratification.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ASE = Agatston score equivalent | | CAD = coronary artery disease | | MSCT = multislice spiral computed tomography | | ROC = receiver-operating characteristic |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F. Tops, S. C. Krishnan, J. D. Schuijf, M. J. Schalij, and J. J. Bax
Noncoronary applications of cardiac multidetector row computed tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
January 1, 2008;
1(1):
94 - 106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V Russo, V Gostoli, L Lovato, M Montalti, A Marzocchi, G Gavelli, A Branzi, R Di Bartolomeo, and R Fattori
Clinical value of multidetector CT coronary angiography as a preoperative screening test before non-coronary cardiac surgery
Heart,
December 1, 2007;
93(12):
1591 - 1598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Laissy, D. Messika-Zeitoun, J.-M. Serfaty, V. Sebban, E. Schouman-Claeys, B. Iung, and A. Vahanian
Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography
Heart,
September 1, 2007;
93(9):
1121 - 1125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Gilard, G. Le Gal, J.-C. Cornily, U. Vinsonneau, C. Joret, P.-Y. Pennec, J. Mansourati, and J. Boschat
Midterm Prognosis of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease and Normal Multislice Computed Tomographic Findings: A Prospective Management Outcome Study
Arch Intern Med,
August 13, 2007;
167(15):
1686 - 1689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Raff and J. A. Goldstein
Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography: Coronary Imaging Evolves
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 8, 2007;
49(18):
1830 - 1833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Shrivastava, S. Vundavalli, L. Mitchell, and J. Dunning
Is cardiac computed tomography a reliable alternative to percutaneous coronary angiography for patients awaiting valve surgery?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
February 1, 2007;
6(1):
105 - 109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, J. Narula, D. J. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 30, 2007;
49(4):
509 - 527.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Bamgartner
Is there a role for multislice computed tomography in aortic stenosis?
Eur. Heart J.,
December 2, 2006;
27(24):
2923 - 2924.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Lavi and S. Lavi
Coronary artery imaging with 64-slice computed tomography from cardiac surgical perspective
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
November 1, 2006;
30(5):
813 - 814.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. B. Meijboom, N. R. Mollet, C. A.G. Van Mieghem, J. Kluin, A. C. Weustink, F. Pugliese, E. Vourvouri, F. Cademartiri, A. J.J.C. Bogers, G. P. Krestin, et al.
Pre-Operative Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography to Detect Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Referred for Cardiac Valve Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 17, 2006;
48(8):
1658 - 1665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hoffmann and M. Shapiro
Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography: A New Standard for Preoperative Risk Assessment?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 16, 2006;
47(10):
2025 - 2026.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|