cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:22-26, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.057
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klein, L. W.

VIEWPOINT

Are Drug-Eluting Stents the Preferred Treatment for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease?

Lloyd W. Klein, MD, FACC*

Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, and Clinical Cardiology Associates, Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, Melrose Park, Illinois

Manuscript received June 27, 2005; revised manuscript received August 1, 2005, accepted August 2, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Lloyd W. Klein, Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, Professional Office Building Suite #314, 675 West North Avenue, Melrose Park, Illinois 60160. (Email: lloydklein{at}comcast.net).

Drug-eluting stents (DES) constitute a major breakthrough in restenosis prevention after initial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Target lesion and vessel revascularization rates of <10% at six months follow-up represent a significant medical advance. Many cardiologists consider it reasonable to assume that PCI using DES ought to be considered equivalent, if not superior, to bypass surgery. The argument made is that in previous randomized clinical trials comparing PCI to coronary artery bypass grafting, restenosis was the determining factor favoring surgery, an event that clinical experience suggests is no longer as frequent. In the absence of a definitive clinical trial to support this view, how should the prudent, cutting edge cardiologist evaluate the data and manage their patients?

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ARTS = Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study
  BMS = bare-metal stent
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  DES = drug-eluting stents
  ERACI = Argentine Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. H. Yang, H.-C. Gwon, S. J. Cho, J. Y. Hahn, J.-H. Choi, S. H. Choi, Y. T. Lee, S. H. Lee, K. P. Hong, and J. E. Park
Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 65 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. H Wong, S. Wan, and M. J Underwood
Myocardial Revascularization: Surgery or Stenting?
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2007; 15(3): 264 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. P. Martens, M. Argenziano, and M. C. Oz
New Technology for Surgical Coronary Revascularization
Circulation, August 8, 2006; 114(6): 606 - 614.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. A. Guyton
Coronary Artery Bypass is Superior to Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 1949 - 1957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home