JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:266-273, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.061 (Published online 5 July 2005).
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Only Appendices
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.01.061v1
46/2/266    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sleeper, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sleeper, L. A.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Functional Status and Quality of Life After Emergency Revascularization for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction

Lynn A. Sleeper, ScD*,*, Krishnan Ramanathan, MD{dagger}, Michael H. Picard, MD{ddagger}, Thierry H. LeJemtel, MD§, Harvey D. White, MD||, Vladimir Dzavik, MD, Deborah Tormey, RN#, Nancy E. Avis, PhD**, Judith S. Hochman, MD{dagger} for the SHOCK Investigators

* New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts
{dagger} New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
{ddagger} Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Division of Cardiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
|| Department of Cardiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
# St. Luke’s/Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York
** Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Manuscript received November 4, 2004; revised manuscript received January 7, 2005, accepted January 11, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Lynn A. Sleeper, New England Research Institutes, 9 Galen Street, Watertown, Massachusetts 02472. (Email: lsleeper{at}neriscience.com).

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to describe the functional status of cardiogenic shock survivors, identify the correlates of cardiogenic shock, and compare global quality of life and functional status of patients randomly assigned to treatment with emergency revascularization (ERV) versus initial medical stabilization (IMS).

BACKGROUND: Historically, the hospital survival rate of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been very low. Shock survivors are salvaged from a critically ill state, and their later functional status is not well documented. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK (SHOCK) trial showed significantly improved one-year survival after ERV compared with IMS.

METHODS: The SHOCK trial survivors completed interviews at 2 weeks after discharge and at 6 and 12 months after MI. Functional status assessment included the Multidimensional Index of Life Quality and New York Heart Association (NYHA) congestive heart failure functional class.

RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of one-year survivors of the SHOCK trial were in NYHA functional class I or II. Between two weeks after discharge and one year after MI, improvement was similar in the two treatment groups (18% overall), but fewer patients remained stable (44% vs. 71%), and more patients worsened or died (34% vs. 15%) in the IMS group compared with those assigned to ERV. Assignment to ERV was the only independent predictor of outcome at one year.

CONCLUSIONS: Although one-year mortality after ERV is still high (54%), most survivors have good functional status. The ERV patients have a lower rate of deterioration than IMS patients. The level of recovery for shock patients undergoing ERV is similar to that of historical controls not in cardiogenic shock undergoing elective revascularization.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ERV = emergency revascularization
  IMS = initial medical stabilization
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MILQ = Multidimensional Index of Life Quality
  NYHA = New York Heart Association
  SHOCK = SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. H. Mehta, J. D. Grab, S. M. O'Brien, D. D. Glower, C. K. Haan, J. S. Gammie, E. D. Peterson, and on Behalf of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Nati
Clinical Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Insights From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 876 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. R. Reynolds and J. S. Hochman
Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes
Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): 686 - 697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. S. Hochman and R. Apolito
The Calm After the Storm: Long-Term Survival After Cardiogenic Shock
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 30, 2007; 50(18): 1759 - 1760.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. M. Krumholz and F. A. Masoudi
The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1886 - 1895.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. S. Hochman, L. A. Sleeper, J. G. Webb, V. Dzavik, C. E. Buller, P. Aylward, J. Col, H. D. White, and for the SHOCK Investigators
Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
JAMA, June 7, 2006; 295(21): 2511 - 2515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, D. Sahn, and S. Tsimikas
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2005
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 184 - 202.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. D. White, S. F. Assmann, T. A. Sanborn, A. K. Jacobs, J. G. Webb, L. A. Sleeper, C.-K. Wong, J. T. Stewart, P. E.G. Aylward, S.-C. Wong, et al.
Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results From the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) Trial
Circulation, September 27, 2005; 112(13): 1992 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. M. Ohman and P. P. Chang
Improving Quality of Life After Cardiogenic Shock: Do More Revascularization!
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 274 - 276.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.