Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:2335-2339, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.070
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perisinakis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gourtsoyiannis, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perisinakis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gourtsoyiannis, N.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: SAFETY ISSUE

Fluoroscopically Guided Implantation of Modern Cardiac Resynchronization Devices

Radiation Burden to the Patient and Associated Risks

Kostas Perisinakis, PhD*,*, Nicholas Theocharopoulos, MSc*,§, John Damilakis, PhD*, Emmanouel Manios, MD{dagger}, Panayiotis Vardas, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC{dagger} and Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis, MD, PhD{ddagger}

* Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Iraklion, Greece
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Iraklion, Greece
{ddagger} Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Iraklion, Greece
§ Department of Natural Sciences, Technical Education Institute of Crete, Iraklion, Greece

Manuscript received August 5, 2004; revised manuscript received January 13, 2005, accepted January 17, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Kostas Perisinakis, Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, 71003 Iraklion, Crete, Greece (Email: perisina{at}med.uoc.gr).

OBJECTIVES: To establish radiation risks for patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided cardiac resynchronization device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchonization therapy (CRT) may be associated with extended fluoroscopic exposure.

METHODS: The fluoroscopy time, dose-area product (DAP), exposure parameters, and percentage contribution of the fluoroscopic projections commonly used were recorded in a series of 14 consecutive patients referred for cardiac resynchronization device implantation and compared to corresponding data obtained from a control group of 20 patients who underwent a conventional rhythm device implantation operation. The DAP to peak skin dose, DAP to effective dose, and DAP to gonadal dose conversion factors were determined for biventricular pacing and conventional rhythm device implantation using a humanoid phantom and thermoluminescence dosimetry.

RESULTS: The mean total fluoroscopy time and DAP values were 35.2 min and 4,765 cGy cm2, respectively, for biventricular pacing and 8.2 min and 1,106 cGy cm2, respectively, for conventional rhythm device implantation. Patient skin dose from biventricular pacing procedures requiring extended fluoroscopic exposure may exceed threshold dose for the induction of skin effects only if X-ray source-to-skin distance is kept low. The risk values for fatal cancer and severe hereditary disorders, respectively, associated with a typical CRT procedure were 273 per million and 0.2 per million treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Radiation risks associated with fluoroscopically guided CRT procedures may be considerable. Present data may be used for the estimation of patient radiation risks from CRT procedures performed in other institutions.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  cGy cm2 = centigray x centimeter2
  CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy
  DAP = dose-area product
  ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  ICRP = International Commission on Radiological Protection
  LAO = left-anterior oblique
  PA = posteroanterior
  RAO = right-anterior oblique
  SSD = source-to-skin distance
  TLD = thermoluminescence dosimeter
  Sv–1 = sievert–1
  Gy–1 = gray–1




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Z. Duray and S. H. Hohnloser
Fighting with the invisible: radiation exposure in cardiac resynchronization therapy
Europace, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1575 - 1576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. Fazel, H. M. Krumholz, Y. Wang, J. S. Ross, J. Chen, H. H. Ting, N. D. Shah, K. Nasir, A. J. Einstein, and B. K. Nallamothu
Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures
N. Engl. J. Med., August 27, 2009; 361(9): 849 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G BEDETTI, N BOTTO, M G ANDREASSI, C TRAINO, E VANO, and E PICANO
Cumulative patient effective dose in cardiology
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 699 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Greenberg and M. R. Mehra
All Patients With Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction Defect or Dyssynchrony Should Not Receive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Circulation, December 12, 2006; 114(24): 2685 - 2691.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Theocharopoulos, J Damilakis, K Perisinakis, E Manios, P Vardas, and N Gourtsoyiannis
Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2006; 79(944): 644 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement