CLINICAL RESEARCH: MRI AND RESYNCHRONIZATION
Propagation of Onset and PeakTime of Myocardial Shortening in Time of Myocardial Shortening in Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
Assessment by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Myocardial Tagging
Jaco J.M. Zwanenburg, MSc*,*,
Marco J.W. Götte, MD, PhD , ,
J. Tim Marcus, PhD*,
Joost P.A. Kuijer, PhD*,
Paul Knaapen, MD ,
Robert M. Heethaar, PhD* and
Albert C. van Rossum, MD, PhD
* Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Manuscript received February 28, 2005;
revised manuscript received August 16, 2005,
accepted August 22, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Jaco J. M. Zwanenburg, Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Email: jjm.zwanenburg{at}vumc.nl).
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to study the relation between onset and peak time of circumferential shortening and the direction of propagation of these parameters in both ischemic and nonischemic patients.
BACKGROUND: Peak time is often used to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy, whereas pacing influences only the onset times directly. Furthermore, it is unclear whether there is a consistent direction of propagation delay and whether this depends on the etiology.
METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging myocardial tagging with high temporal resolution (14 ms) was applied to 29 patients (18 nonischemic, 11 ischemic) and 17 healthy control subjects. Time to onset (Tonset), to first peak (Tpeak,first), and to maximum peak (Tpeak,max) of circumferential shortening were determined. Three-dimensional vectors were calculated to denote the main direction of asynchrony.
RESULTS: In both patient groups, Tonset showed a significant positive relation with both Tpeak,first and Tpeak,max; however, Tpeak,first correlated considerably better with Tonset than did Tpeak,max (p < 0.0001 for nonischemic, and p < 0.01 for ischemic patients). Moreover, the relations between Tpeak and Tonset were stronger in the nonischemic patients than in the ischemic patients (p < 0.001). In nonischemic patients, the propagation of Tonset was consistently from septum to lateral wall. In the ischemic patients, however, no consistent direction of propagation was found. For both groups, the longitudinal propagation delays (between apex and base) were negligible compared with the short-axis delays.
CONCLUSIONS: The relation between peak time and onset time of shortening is strongest in nonischemic patients and is most consistent when time to first peak is used (instead of time to maximum peak).
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy | | ECG = electrocardiogram | | EF = ejection fraction | | LV = left ventricle/ventricular | | MRI = magnetic resonance imaging | | OS = onset of shortening | | PS = peak shortening | | SV = stroke volume | | Tonset = time to onset | | Tpeak,first = time to first peak | | Tpeak,max = time to maximum peak |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Rutz, R. Manka, S. Kozerke, S. Roas, P. Boesiger, and J. Schwitter
Left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and patients after myocardial infarction: integration of mechanics and viability by cardiac magnetic resonance
Eur. Heart J.,
September 1, 2009;
30(17):
2117 - 2127.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-U. Voigt, T.-M. Schneider, S. Korder, M. Szulik, E. Gurel, W. G. Daniel, F. Rademakers, and F. A. Flachskampf
Apical transverse motion as surrogate parameter to determine regional left ventricular function inhomogeneities: a new, integrative approach to left ventricular asynchrony assessment
Eur. Heart J.,
April 2, 2009;
30(8):
959 - 968.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mele, T. Toselli, F. Capasso, G. Stabile, M. Piacenti, M. Piepoli, S. Giatti, C. Klersy, L. Sallusti, and R. Ferrari
Comparison of myocardial deformation and velocity dyssynchrony for identification of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Eur J Heart Fail,
April 1, 2009;
11(4):
391 - 399.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Kirn, A. Jansen, F. Bracke, B. van Gelder, T. Arts, and F. W. Prinzen
Mechanical discoordination rather than dyssynchrony predicts reverse remodeling upon cardiac resynchronization
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
August 1, 2008;
295(2):
H640 - H646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. W.L. De Boeck, M. Meine, G. E. Leenders, A. J. Teske, H. van Wessel, J. H. Kirkels, F. W. Prinzen, P. A. Doevendans, and M. J. Cramer
Practical and conceptual limitations of tissue Doppler imaging to predict reverse remodelling in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
Eur J Heart Fail,
March 1, 2008;
10(3):
281 - 290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. White, R. Yee, X. Yuan, A. Krahn, A. Skanes, M. Parker, G. Klein, and M. Drangova
Delayed Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Intraventricular Dyssynchrony
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 21, 2006;
48(10):
1953 - 1960.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J.W. Gotte, T. Germans, I. K. Russel, J. J.M. Zwanenburg, J. T. Marcus, A. C. van Rossum, and D. J. van Veldhuisen
Myocardial Strain and Torsion Quantified by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Tissue Tagging: Studies in Normal and Impaired Left Ventricular Function
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 21, 2006;
48(10):
2002 - 2011.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|