CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART RHYTHM DISORDERS
Right Atrial Pacing Impairs Cardiac Function During Resynchronization Therapy
Acute Effects of DDD Pacing Compared to VDD Pacing
Alain Bernheim, MD,
Peter Ammann, MD,
Christian Sticherling, MD,
Peter Burger, MD,
Beat Schaer, MD,
Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca, MD,
Jens Eckstein, MD,
Stephanie Kiencke, MD,
Christoph Kaiser, MD,
Andre Linka, MD,
Peter Buser, MD,
Matthias Pfisterer, MD and
Stefan Osswald, MD*
Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Manuscript received August 16, 2004;
revised manuscript received October 12, 2004,
accepted January 11, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stefan Osswald, Cardiac Unit, University Hospital, CH 4031-Basel, Switzerland. (Email: sosswald{at}uhbs.ch).
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of right-atrial-paced (DDD) and right-atrial-sensed (VDD) biventricular paced rhythm on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics in patients with severe heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, the impact of active right atrial pacing on resynchronization therapy is unknown.
METHODS: Seventeen CRT patients were studied 10 months (range: 1 to 46 months) after implantation. At baseline, the programmed atrioventricular delay was optimized by timing LV contraction properly at the end of atrial contraction. In both modes the acute hemodynamic effects were assessed by multiple Doppler echocardiographic parameters.
RESULTS: Compared to DDD pacing, VDD pacing resulted in much better improvement of intraventricular dyssynchrony assessed by the septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (VDD 106 ± 83 ms vs. DDD 145 ± 95 ms; p = 0.001), whereas the interventricular mechanical delay (difference between onset of pulmonary and aortic outflow) did not differ (VDD 20 ± 21 ms vs. DDD 18 ± 17 ms; p = NS). Furthermore, VDD pacing significantly prolonged the rate-corrected LV filling period (VDD 458 ± 123 ms vs. DDD 371 ± 94 ms; p = 0.0001) and improved the myocardial performance index (VDD 0.60 ± 0.18 vs. DDD 0.71 ± 0.23; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that avoidance of right atrial pacing results in a higher degree of LV resynchronization, in a substantial prolongation of the LV filling period, and in an improved myocardial performance. Thus, the VDD mode seems to be superior to the DDD mode in CRT patients.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AV = atrioventricular | | AVD = atrioventricular delay | | CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy | | ET = ejection time | | ICT = isovolumic contraction time | | IVRT = isovolumic relaxation time | | LV = left ventricle/ventricular | | LVOT-TVI = time velocity integral in the left ventricular outflow tract | | SPWMD = septal-to-posterior wall motion delay | | TDI = tissue Doppler imaging |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Heinroth, M. Elster, S. Nuding, F. Schlegel, A. Christoph, J. Carter, M. Buerke, and K. Werdan
Impedance cardiography: a useful and reliable tool in optimization of cardiac resynchronization devices
Europace,
September 1, 2007;
9(9):
744 - 750.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Cicoira, D. Natarajan, C. A. Henrikson, and J. Jarcho
Biventricular Pacing
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 19, 2006;
355(16):
1738 - 1739.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. V. Pitzalis, M. Iacoviello, R. Romito, G. Luzzi, M. Anaclerio, and C. Forleo
Role of Septal to Posterior Wall Motion Delay in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 1, 2006;
48(3):
596 - 597.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. J. Liakopoulos, H. Tomioka, G. D. Buckberg, Z. Tan, N. Hristov, and G. Trummer
Sequential deformation and physiological considerations in unipolar right or left ventricular pacing
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
April 1, 2006;
29(Suppl_1):
S188 - S197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Buckberg and the RESTORE Group
The ventricular septum: the lion of right ventricular function, and its impact on right ventricular restoration
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
April 1, 2006;
29(Suppl_1):
S272 - S278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Kass
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Cardiac Reserve: How You Climb a Staircase May Alter Its Steepness
Circulation,
February 21, 2006;
113(7):
923 - 925.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, D. Sahn, and S. Tsimikas
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2005
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 3, 2006;
47(1):
184 - 202.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Amato Jr., L. Fauchier, D. Babuty, E. K. Heist, J. W. Harthorne, J. P. Singh, W. D. Toff, A. J. Camm, J. D. Skehan, and the UKPACE Trial Investigators
Pacing for atrioventricular block.
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 20, 2005;
353(16):
1742 - 1744.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|