CLINICAL RESEARCH: STRESS IMAGING
Safety of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography
Jeane M. Tsutsui, MD,
Abdou Elhendy, MD, FACC,
Feng Xie, MD,
Edward L. OLeary, MD, FACC,
Anna C. McGrain, RN, BSN and
Thomas R. Porter, MD, FACC*
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Manuscript received November 3, 2004;
revised manuscript received December 9, 2004,
accepted January 4, 2005.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Thomas R. Porter, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 981165 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-1165. (Email: trporter{at}unmc.edu).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the safety of dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) obtained by real-time contrast echocardiography (RTCE) and intravenous ultrasound contrast in a large cohort of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of studies showing the potential clinical utility of myocardial contrast perfusion imaging with commercially available contrast agents, the safety of this technique in a clinical setting has not been demonstrated.
METHODS: Over a four-year period, 1,486 patients underwent dobutamine stress RTCE with low mechanical index pulse sequence schemes after intravenous injections of commercially available contrast agents (35% Definity, Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Imaging Inc., North Billerica, Massachusetts; 65% Optison, GE-Amersham, Princeton, New Jersey). The hemodynamic and adverse effects of RTCE were compared with 1,012 patients who underwent conventional dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) without contrast. The feasibility of image analysis was defined as the ability to analyze MPI in at least two of the three standard segments in each left ventricular wall.
RESULTS: No myocardial infarction or death occurred during dobutamine stress. There was no difference in the incidence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or supraventricular tachycardia during dobutamine infusion between RTCE and DSE. Myocardial perfusion imaging was considered feasible for analysis in 94% of the walls at baseline and 95% at peak stress. The anterior, lateral, and posterior walls were the most common regions in which MPI was not feasible. Myocardial perfusion imaging with RTCE had a higher accuracy for detecting patients with angiographically significant CAD than the analysis of wall motion (84% vs. 66%, respectively; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine stress RTCE appears to be a safe and feasible technique for evaluating patients with known or suspected CAD.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAD = coronary artery disease | | DSE = dobutamine stress echocardiography | | FDA = Food and Drug Administration | | LV = left ventricular | | MPI = myocardial perfusion imaging | | PVC = premature ventricular complexes | | RTCE = real-time contrast echocardiography | | WMA = wall motion abnormalities |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Abdelmoneim, M. Bernier, C. G. Scott, A. Dhoble, S. A. C. Ness, M. E. Hagen, S. Moir, R. B. McCully, P. A. Pellikka, and S. L. Mulvagh
Safety of Contrast Agent Use During Stress Echocardiography: A 4-Year Experience From a Single-Center Cohort Study of 26,774 Patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
September 1, 2009;
2(9):
1048 - 1056.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gaibazzi, A. Squeri, D. Ardissino, and C. Reverberi
Safety of contrast flash-replenishment stress echocardiography in 500 patients with a chest pain episode of undetermined origin within the last 5 days
Eur J Echocardiogr,
August 1, 2009;
10(6):
726 - 732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Senior, H. Becher, M. Monaghan, L. Agati, J. Zamorano, J. L. Vanoverschelde, and P. Nihoyannopoulos
Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
March 1, 2009;
10(2):
194 - 212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Marcucci, R. Lauer, and A. Mahajan
New Echocardiographic Techniques for Evaluating Left Ventricular Myocardial Function
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
December 1, 2008;
12(4):
228 - 247.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Aggeli, G Giannopoulos, G Roussakis, E Christoforatou, G Marinos, C Toli, C Pitsavos, and C Stefanadis
Safety of myocardial flash-contrast echocardiography in combination with dobutamine stress testing for the detection of ischaemia in 5250 studies
Heart,
December 1, 2008;
94(12):
1571 - 1577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kobayashi, H. Izawa, X. W. Cheng, H. Asano, A. Hirashiki, K. Unno, S. Ohshima, T. Yamada, Y. Murase, T. S. Kato, et al.
Dobutamine stress testing as a diagnostic tool for evaluation of myocardial contractile reserve in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
November 1, 2008;
1(6):
718 - 726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Tsutsui, F. Xie, D. Cloutier, S. Kalvaitis, A. Elhendy, and T. R. Porter
Real-time dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion echocardiography predicts outcome in the elderly
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2008;
29(3):
377 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Greenbaum, P. Burns, J. Copel, D. Cosgrove, J. B. Fowlkes, B. Goldberg, R. Mattrey, D. Merton, M. Robbin, and S. Wilson
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Liver Ultrasound Imaging Clinical Trials
J. Ultrasound Med.,
June 1, 2007;
26(6):
705 - 716.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Olszewski, J. Timperley, S. Cezary, M. Monaghan, P. Nihoyannopoulis, R. Senior, and H. Becher
The clinical applications of contrast echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
June 1, 2007;
8(3):
s13 - s23.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Vancraeynest, J. Kefer, C. Hanet, C. Fillee, C. Beauloye, A. Pasquet, B. L. Gerber, M. Philippe, and J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde
Release of cardiac bio-markers during high mechanical index contrast-enhanced echocardiography in humans
Eur. Heart J.,
May 2, 2007;
28(10):
1236 - 1241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Dijkmans, R. Senior, H. Becher, T. R. Porter, K. Wei, C. A. Visser, and O. Kamp
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion: The Evidence So Far
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 5, 2006;
48(11):
2168 - 2177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Elhendy, J M Tsutsui, E L O'Leary, F Xie, F Majeed, and T R Porter
Evaluation of restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with previous percutaneous coronary interventions by dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging
Heart,
October 1, 2006;
92(10):
1480 - 1483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Elhendy and T. R. Porter
Myocardial contrast quantitation during stress echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
June 1, 2006;
7(3):
185 - 186.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, D. Sahn, and S. Tsimikas
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2005
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 3, 2006;
47(1):
184 - 202.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Timperley and H. Becher
Safety of Dobutamine Contrast Stress Echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 15, 2005;
46(10):
1963 - 1963.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Tsutsui, A. Elhendy, F. Xie, E. O'Leary, A. C. McGrain, and T. R. Porter
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 15, 2005;
46(10):
1963 - 1964.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior
Safety: The heart of the matter
Eur J Echocardiogr,
August 1, 2005;
6(4):
235 - 237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Elhendy, J. M. Tsutsui, E. L. O'Leary, F. Xie, A. C. McGrain, and T. R. Porter
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes by Dobutamine Stress Real-Time Myocardial Contrast Perfusion Imaging
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2005;
28(7):
1662 - 1667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|