|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:1025-1030, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.081 © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
Manuscript received April 14, 2004; accepted June 22, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Roldano Scognamiglio, Cattedra e Divisione di Cardiologia, Policlinico Universitario, via Giustiniani 2, I-35128 Padova, Italy (Email: r.scognamiglio{at}unipd.it).
OBJECTIVES: We examined the influence of medical treatment on the results of surgery in terms of long-term survival and functional results in patients with chronic, severe aortic regurgitation (AR).
BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic patients with AR and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are at high risk because of a higher-than-expected long-term mortality. The influence of preoperative medical therapy on the outcome after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not well known.
METHODS: Surgery was indicated for the appearance of a reduced LVEF (<50%). At the time of AVR, there were 134 patients treated with nifedipine (group A), and 132 received no medication (group B).
RESULTS: Operative mortality was similar in the two groups (0.75% vs. 0.76%, p = NS). The LVEF normalized in all of group A, whereas it remained abnormal in 36 group B patients (28%). At 10-year follow-up, LVEF persisted higher in group A (62 ± 5% vs. 48 ± 4%, p < 0.001). Five-year survival was similar in the two groups (94 ± 2% vs. 94 ± 3%, p = NS). Group A showed a 10-year survival not different from expected and significantly higher than that in group B (85 ± 4% vs. 78 ± 5%, p < 0.001), which had a worse survival than expected.
CONCLUSIONS: Unloading treatment with nifedipine in AR allows one to indicate AVR at the appearance of a reduced LVEF with a low operative mortality and an optimal long-term outcome. The concept of surgical correction of AR indicated for reduced LVEF may not be applied to all patients. Indeed, in a large amount of untreated patients, a reduced LVEF preoperatively is not reversed by prompt surgery, indicating irreversible myocardial damage, and 10-year survival is worse than expected.
| ||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, A. Vahanian, H. Baumgartner, J. Bax, E. Butchart, R. Dion, G. Filippatos, F. Flachskampf, R. Hall, B. Iung, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., January 26, 2007; (2007) ehl428v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, G. S. Ginsburg, B. H. Greenberg, W. Y.W. Lew, D. Sahn, and S. Tsimikas Highlights of the Year in JACC 2005 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 184 - 202. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Evangelista, P. Tornos, A. Sambola, G. Permanyer-Miralda, and J. Soler-Soler Long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with severe aortic regurgitation. N. Engl. J. Med., September 29, 2005; 353(13): 1342 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Carabello Vasodilators in aortic regurgitation--where is the evidence of their effectiveness? N. Engl. J. Med., September 29, 2005; 353(13): 1400 - 1402. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Timing of Surgery for Asymptomatic, Severe Aortic Regurgitation Journal Watch Cardiology, April 22, 2005; 2005(422): 4 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |