JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:846-854, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.026
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wentzel, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Badimon, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wentzel, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Badimon, J. J.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: ATHEROSCLEROSIS

Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta?

Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging

Jolanda J. Wentzel, PhD*,||, Roberto Corti, MD*,{ddagger}, Zahi A. Fayad, PhD{dagger}, Paul Wisdom, Bsc{dagger}, Frank Macaluso, Bsc{dagger}, Mark O. Winkelman, Msc§, Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD§ and Juan J. Badimon, PhD{ddagger},*

* Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
{dagger} Imaging Science Laboratory, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
{ddagger} Cardiovascular Biology Research Laboratory, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
§ Damen Dredging Equipment, Research Department, Nijkerk, the Netherlands
|| Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Manuscript received August 6, 2004; revised manuscript received November 12, 2004, accepted December 14, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Juan J. Badimon, Professor of Medicine, Cardiovascular Biology Research Laboratory, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, New York 10029-6574 (Email: juan.badimon{at}mssm.edu).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of shear stress (SS) in plaque regression.

BACKGROUND: A condition favorable to the development of atherosclerotic lesions is low oscillating SS. In the descending thoracic aorta, the relationship between plaque distribution and SS has never been characterized. The regression of plaque as the result of lipid-lowering therapy is associated with reverse atherogenic mechanisms. Therefore, we investigated the role of SS in plaque regression. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a unique opportunity to noninvasively study morphology and hemodynamics.

METHODS: Cross-sectional images of atherosclerotic plaques in the descending thoracic aorta of 10 asymptomatic, hypercholesteremic patients were acquired at baseline and 24 months after starting lipid-lowering therapy by using a black-blood sequence on a 1.5-T clinical MRI system (5 mm x 780 µm x 780 µm). Average wall thickness (WT) was derived per quadrant. The aorta was subdivided in segments 2 cm in length starting 1 cm from the aortic arch.

RESULTS: Average WT decreased with increasing distance from the arch (3.0 ± 0.7 mm vs. 2.5 ± 0.3 mm; p < 0.05) and showed a helical pattern from the proximal to distal segments. Phase-contrast MRI was performed in the thoracic aorta of eight healthy volunteers to derive typical average SS distribution. Shear stress predicted the location of WT (r2 = 0.29, p < 0.05) but did not predict plaque regression. The best predictor of plaque regression was baseline WT.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data showing an association between WT and average low SS locations support the role of local hemodynamics in the development of atherosclerotic lesions in descending thoracic aorta. Furthermore, SS does not seem to be the major predictor for plaque regression by lipid-lowering interventions. Therefore, our data suggest that other mechanisms are involved in the lipid-reversal mechanism.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ANOVA = analysis of variance
  LDL = low-density lipoprotein
  MRI = magnetic resonance imaging
  NWT = normalized wall thickness
  SS = shear stress
  WT = wall thickness
  WTbaseline = wall thickness at baseline




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Harloff, P Dudler, A Frydrychowicz, C Strecker, A L Stroh, A Geibel, C Weiller, A Hetzel, J Hennig, and M Markl
Reliability of aortic MRI at 3 Tesla in patients with acute cryptogenic stroke
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 79(5): 540 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. S. Chatzizisis, A. U. Coskun, M. Jonas, E. R. Edelman, C. L. Feldman, and P. H. Stone
Role of Endothelial Shear Stress in the Natural History of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Vascular Remodeling: Molecular, Cellular, and Vascular Behavior
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 26, 2007; 49(25): 2379 - 2393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Frydrychowicz, C. Schlensak, A. Stalder, M. Russe, M. Siepe, F. Beyersdorf, M. Langer, J. Hennig, and M. Markl
Ascending-descending aortic bypass surgery in aortic arch coarctation: Four-dimensional magnetic resonance flow analysis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2007; 133(1): 260 - 262.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.