This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saxonhouse, S. J. Articles by Curtis, A. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saxonhouse, S. J. Articles by Curtis, A. B.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART RHYTHM DISORDERS

Current of injury predicts adequate active lead fixation in permanent pacemaker/defibrillation leads

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida

Manuscript received May 16, 2004; revised manuscript received September 28, 2004, accepted October 18, 2004.

^* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Sherry J. Saxonhouse, University of Florida College of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, PO Box 100277, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0277 (Email: saxonsj{at}medicine.ufl.edu).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether current of injury can guide adequate placement of active-fixation pacing leads.

BACKGROUND: Active-fixation leads cause injury to the myocardium at the time of fixation, manifested as a current of injury (COI) that may result in acute elevation of pacing thresholds. The relationship of COI to subsequent improvement in pacing thresholds is not clear.

METHODS: Sixty-five patients undergoing active-fixation lead implantation were enrolled. Current of injury was characterized as the duration of the intracardiac electrogram (EGM) and the magnitude of ST-segment elevation. Pacing parameters were measured up to 10 min after fixation.

RESULTS: A total of 96 active-fixation leads were studied, and 76 leads had a current of injury. From baseline to the time of fixation, the duration of the intracardiac EGM in ventricular leads increased from 150 ± 31 ms to 200 ± 25 ms (p < 0.001), and the ST-segment increased from 1.5 ± 0.2 mV to 10.0 ± 2.0 mV (p < 0.001), with subsequent improvement in pacing thresholds from 1.5 ± 0.4 V to 0.8 ± 0.3 V (p < 0.001) at 10 min. Atrial leads with a current of injury had similar findings. Of the 20 leads without a COI, 5 dislodged acutely and 15 had high pacing thresholds at 10 min, requiring repositioning.

CONCLUSIONS: The development of a COI indicates that within 10 min of fixation, pacing threshold will return to an acceptable range even if the initial measurement is high. Conversely, without a COI, lead fixation is not adequate and the lead should be repositioned.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   COI = current of injury   EGM = electrogram

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. G. Tereshchenko, M. N. Faddis, B. J. Fetics, K. E. Zelik, I. R. Efimov, and R. D. Berger Transient local injury current in right ventricular electrogram after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock predicts heart failure progression. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 25, 2009; 54(9): 822 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gupta, S. M. Halleran, K. Krishnan, and R. G. Trohman Rescue permanent iliac vein pacing after epicardial lead failure: an unusual reversal of pacing fortune Europace, October 1, 2008; 10(10): 1236 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Reynolds, D. J. Cohen, A. D. Kugelmass, P. P. Brown, E. R. Becker, S. D. Culler, and A. W. Simon The Frequency and Incremental Cost of Major Complications Among Medicare Beneficiaries Receiving Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2493 - 2497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]