cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:377-380, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.043
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: TREATMENT OF PATENT FORAMEN OVALE

Transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm associated with patent foramen ovale for prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism in high-risk patients

Andreas Wahl, MD*, Ulrike Krumsdorf, MD{ddagger}, Bernhard Meier, MD*, Horst Sievert, MD{ddagger}, Stephan Ostermayer, MD{ddagger},*, Kai Billinger, MD{ddagger}, Markus Schwerzmann, MD*, Ulf Becker, MD*, Christian Seiler, MD*, Marcel Arnold, MD{dagger}, Heinrich P. Mattle, MD{dagger} and Stephan Windecker, MD

* Cardiology
{dagger} Neurology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
{ddagger} Cardiovascular Center, Frankfurt, Germany

Manuscript received June 28, 2004; accepted October 18, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stephan Windecker, Director, Invasive Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Bern University Hospital, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland (Email: stephan.windecker{at}insel.ch).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO).

BACKGROUND: Patients with both ASA and PFO are at high risk for recurrent paradoxical embolism.

METHODS: The procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of 141 patients with ASA + PFO and ≥1 paradoxical embolic event undergoing transcatheter treatment were compared with 220 patients with PFO alone.

RESULTS: Device success (ASA + PFO, 99.3%; PFO alone, 99.5%; p = 0.75) and procedural complications (ASA + PFO, 0.7%; PFO alone, 3.2%; p = 0.12) were similar in both groups. Maximal atrial septal excursion in patients with ASA + PFO decreased from 16 ± 4 mm before to 4 ± 3 mm after the intervention (p < 0.0001). At 6 months follow-up, right-to-left shunt was abolished in 120 (86%) patients with ASA + PFO, compared to 187 (85%) patients with PFO alone (p = 0.80). Freedom from recurrent transient ischemic attack, stroke, and peripheral embolism at 4 years was 95% (ASA + PFO) and 94% (PFO alone, p = 0.70), respectively. A residual right-to-left shunt after the intervention was the only predictor for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 36.9, p < 0.03) in patients with ASA + PFO.

CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter treatment of ASA + PFO is safe and effective in patients with paradoxical embolism. The procedure effectively abolishes right-to-left shunt and decreases atrial septal mobility. Long-term prevention of recurrent events appears favorable when compared to patients with PFO alone.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ASA = atrial septal aneurysm
  CI = confidence interval
  HR = hazard ratio
  PFO = patent foramen ovale
  TEE = transesophageal echocardiography
  TIA = transient ischemic attack




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A Wahl and B Meier
Patent foramen ovale and ventricular septal defect closure
Heart, January 1, 2009; 95(1): 70 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Windecker and B. Meier
Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: To Close or Not to Close? Closure: What Else!
Circulation, November 4, 2008; 118(19): 1989 - 1997.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. R. Messe and S. E. Kasner
Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke: Not to Close
Circulation, November 4, 2008; 118(19): 1999 - 2004.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Wahl, M Kunz, A Moschovitis, T Nageh, M Schwerzmann, C Seiler, H P Mattle, S Windecker, and B Meier
Long-term results after fluoroscopy-guided closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism
Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 336 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. M. Burch, M. F. Davidson, and S. J. Pereira
Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Evaluation and Surgical Treatment of a Patient with an Aneurysmal Interatrial Septum and an Intracardiac Thrombus Traversing a Patent Foramen Ovale
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 769 - 770.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Spies, R. Strasheim, I. Timmermanns, and R. Schraeder
Patent foramen ovale closure in patients with cryptogenic thrombo-embolic events using the Cardia PFO occluder
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2006; 27(3): 365 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Meier
Patent Foramen Ovale, Guilty But Only as a Gang Member and for a Lesser Crime
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 446 - 448.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home