CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART FAILURE
Contribution of ischemic mitral regurgitation to congestive heart failure after myocardial infarction
Francesco Grigioni, MD*,
Delphine Detaint, MD*,
Jean-François Avierinos, MD*,
Christopher Scott, MS ,
Jamil Tajik, MD, FACC* and
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, MD, FACC*,*
* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
Manuscript received March 23, 2004;
revised manuscript received September 27, 2004,
accepted October 4, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 (Email: sarano.maurice{at}mayo.edu).
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to define the contribution of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) to the occurrence of congestive heart failure (CHF) after myocardial infarction (MI).
BACKGROUND: After MI, CHF is a frequent and serious complication, but its determinants and, particularly, the role of IMR are poorly defined.
METHODS: We analyzed 173 asymptomatic patients with previous Q-wave MI (>16 days) with echocardiographic quantitation of IMR (measuring effective regurgitant orifice [ERO] and regurgitant volume). The 102 patients with IMR were matched to 71 patients without IMR for age (71 ± 11 years vs. 68 ± 9 years; p = 0.11), gender (76% vs. 82% males; p = 0.41), and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (37 ± 14% vs. 36 ± 11%; p = 0.92).
RESULTS: Five-year rates of CHF and of CHF or cardiac death (CD) were 36 ± 5% and 52 ± 5%, respectively. Independent determinants of CHF were EF, sodium plasma level, and presence and degree of IMR (p < 0.0001). Five-year CHF rates were 18 ± 5% without mitral regurgitation (MR), 53 ± 7% with IMR, 46 ± 9% with ERO 1 to 19 mm2 and 68 ± 12% with ERO 20 mm2 (all p < 0.0001). The adjusted relative risk of CHF was 3.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.86 to 7.75) for IMR presence and 4.42 (95% CI 1.9 to 10.5) for ERO 20 mm2. The adjusted relative risk of CHF/CD was 2.97 (95% CI 1.77 to 5.16) for IMR presence and 4.4 (95% CI 2.4 to 8.2) for ERO 20 mm2.
CONCLUSIONS: After MI, incidence of CHF and of CHF/CD are high even in patients with no or minimal symptoms at baseline and are higher in patients with IMR. Congestive heart failure is independently determined by larger ERO of IMR. These data suggest that detecting and quantifying IMR is essential for risk stratification after MI. Value of IMR treatment in improving post-MI outcome should be investigated.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CD = cardiac death | | CHF = congestive heart failure | | CI = confidence interval | | EF = ejection fraction | | ERO = effective regurgitant orifice | | IMR = ischemic mitral regurgitation | | LA = left atrium | | LV = left ventricle | | MI = myocardial infarction | | MR = mitral regurgitation | | NYHA = New York Heart Association | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | RR = risk ratio | | RVol = regurgitant volume | | SAVE = Survival And Ventricular Enlargement study |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Marsan, J. J.M. Westenberg, C. Ypenburg, V. Delgado, R. J. van Bommel, S. D. Roes, G. Nucifora, R. J. van der Geest, A. de Roos, J. C. Reiber, et al.
Quantification of Functional Mitral Regurgitation by Real-Time 3D Echocardiography: Comparison With 3D Velocity-Encoded Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
November 1, 2009;
2(11):
1245 - 1252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Langer, T. Kunihara, K. Hell, R. Schramm, K. I. Schmidt, D. Aicher, M. Kindermann, and H.-J. Schafers
RING+STRING: Successful Repair Technique for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation With Severe Leaflet Tethering
Circulation,
September 15, 2009;
120(11_suppl_1):
S85 - S91.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Suma, H. Tanabe, T. Uejima, T. Isomura, and T. Horii
Surgical ventricular restoration combined with mitral valve procedure for endstage ischemic cardiomyopathy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
August 1, 2009;
36(2):
280 - 285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Agricola, A. Ielasi, M. Oppizzi, P. Faggiano, L. Ferri, A. Calabrese, E. Vizzardi, O. Alfieri, and A. Margonato
Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with functional mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction
Eur J Heart Fail,
June 1, 2009;
11(6):
581 - 587.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Russo, R. M. Suri, F. Grigioni, V. L. Roger, J. K. Oh, D. W. Mahoney, H. V. Schaff, and M. Enriquez-Sarano
Clinical Outcome After Surgical Correction of Mitral Regurgitation Due to Papillary Muscle Rupture
Circulation,
October 7, 2008;
118(15):
1528 - 1534.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Agricola, M. Oppizzi, M. Pisani, A. Meris, F. Maisano, and A. Margonato
Ischemic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms and echocardiographic classification
Eur J Echocardiogr,
March 1, 2008;
9(2):
207 - 221.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Enriquez-Sarano, V. T. Nkomo, and H. Michelena
Principles and Practice of Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2008;
3(2008):
315 - 348.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. I. Fann, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller
Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Disease
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2008;
3(2008):
973 - 1012.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Lancellotti, E. Donal, B. Cosyns, G. Van Camp, J.-L. Monin, E. Brochet, A. Berrebi, P. Pibarot, C. Chauvel, C. Hassager, et al.
Effects of surgery on ischaemic mitral regurgitation: a prospective multicentre registry (SIMRAM registry)
Eur J Echocardiogr,
January 1, 2008;
9(1):
26 - 30.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Perez de Isla, J. Zamorano, M. Quezada, C. Almeria, J. L. Rodrigo, V. Serra, J. C. Garcia Rubira, A. F. Ortiz, and C. Macaya
Functional mitral regurgitation after a first non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: contribution to congestive heart failure
Eur. Heart J.,
December 1, 2007;
28(23):
2866 - 2872.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Mihaljevic, B.-K. Lam, J. Rajeswaran, M. Takagaki, M. S. Lauer, A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, and B. W. Lytle
Impact of Mitral Valve Annuloplasty Combined With Revascularization in Patients With Functional Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 5, 2007;
49(22):
2191 - 2201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Aronson, N. Goldsher, R. Zukermann, M. Kapeliovich, J. Lessick, D. Mutlak, S. Dabbah, W. Markiewicz, R. Beyar, H. Hammerman, et al.
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation and Risk of Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction
Arch Intern Med,
November 27, 2006;
166(21):
2362 - 2368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Spoor, A. Geltz, and S. F. Bolling
Flexible Versus Nonflexible Mitral Valve Rings for Congestive Heart Failure: Differential Durability of Repair
Circulation,
July 4, 2006;
114(1_suppl):
I-67 - I-71.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|