|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1210-1214, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.051 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |







,*
* Harvard Clinical Research Institute
Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Manuscript received March 17, 2004; revised manuscript received May 5, 2004, accepted June 7, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Donald E. Cutlip, Interventional Cardiology Section, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Road, Baker 4, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 (Email: dcutlip{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) on mortality according to success of the stent procedure.
BACKGROUND: The mortality effect of periprocedural MI relative to successful versus unsuccessful procedures has not been examined.
METHODS: All-cause mortality during the first year was evaluated prospectively among 5,850 patients from coronary stent clinical trials. Myocardial infarction was classified according to creatine kinase-MB level as type 1 (>1 but <3 times normal), type 2 (
3 but
8 times normal), or type 3 (>8 times normal or Q-wave MI). Procedures were classified as successful unless there was a final diameter stenosis >50%; final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3; final National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute dissection grade
D; repeat revascularization within 24 h; or stent thrombosis within 24 h.
RESULTS: Myocardial infarction was more frequent after unsuccessful procedures (69.6% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001). Mortality during the first year was higher in patients with MI (2.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.01), but the effect was significant only for type 3 MI (4.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.008). Moreover, the mortality difference for any MI was confined to patients with unsuccessful procedures (13.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.03), with no significant effect among patients with otherwise successful procedures (2.1% vs. 1.7%, p > 0.20). The independent predictors of mortality were unsuccessful procedure (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), history of prior MI (p = 0.003), multivessel disease (p = 0.006), and advancing age (p < 0.001), but not periprocedural MI.
CONCLUSIONS: The association of periprocedural MI with increased mortality during the first year following stent placement was confined to patients with unsuccessful procedures.
| |||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. L. Dauerman Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pharmacology From a Triangle to a Square. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 698 - 700. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Larose Below Radar: Contributions of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to the Understanding of Myonecrosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): 620 - 622. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D P Chew, D L Bhatt, A M Lincoff, K Wolski, and E J Topol Clinical end point definitions after percutaneous coronary intervention and their relationship to late mortality: an assessment by attributable risk Heart, July 1, 2006; 92(7): 945 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Bhatt and E. J. Topol Periprocedural Cardiac Enzyme Elevation Predicts Adverse Outcomes Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 906 - 922. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Cutlip and R. E. Kuntz Cardiac Enzyme Elevation After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Not an Independent Predictor of Adverse Outcomes Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 916 - 923. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P.A. Ioannidis, E. Karvouni, and D. G. Katritsis Creatine Kinase-MB Elevation Following Stent Implantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1908 - 1908. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jeremias, D. S. Baim, R. E. Kuntz, and D. E. Cutlip Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1908 - 1909. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |