Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1210-1214, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.051
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeremias, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeremias, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.

INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Differential mortality risk of postprocedural creatine kinase-MB elevation following successful versus unsuccessful stent procedures

Allen Jeremias, MD*,{dagger}, Donald S. Baim, MD, FACC*,{ddagger}, Kalon K.L. Ho, MD, MS, FACC*,{dagger}, Manish Chauhan, MD, FACC{dagger}, Joseph P. Carrozza, Jr, MD, FACC*, David J. Cohen, MD, MS*,{dagger}, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Richard E. Kuntz, MD, MS*,{ddagger} and Donald E. Cutlip, MD, FACC*,{dagger},*

* Harvard Clinical Research Institute
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
{ddagger} Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Manuscript received March 17, 2004; revised manuscript received May 5, 2004, accepted June 7, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Donald E. Cutlip, Interventional Cardiology Section, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Road, Baker 4, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 (Email: dcutlip{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) on mortality according to success of the stent procedure.

BACKGROUND: The mortality effect of periprocedural MI relative to successful versus unsuccessful procedures has not been examined.

METHODS: All-cause mortality during the first year was evaluated prospectively among 5,850 patients from coronary stent clinical trials. Myocardial infarction was classified according to creatine kinase-MB level as type 1 (>1 but <3 times normal), type 2 (≥3 but ≤8 times normal), or type 3 (>8 times normal or Q-wave MI). Procedures were classified as successful unless there was a final diameter stenosis >50%; final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3; final National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute dissection grade ≥D; repeat revascularization within 24 h; or stent thrombosis within 24 h.

RESULTS: Myocardial infarction was more frequent after unsuccessful procedures (69.6% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001). Mortality during the first year was higher in patients with MI (2.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.01), but the effect was significant only for type 3 MI (4.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.008). Moreover, the mortality difference for any MI was confined to patients with unsuccessful procedures (13.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.03), with no significant effect among patients with otherwise successful procedures (2.1% vs. 1.7%, p > 0.20). The independent predictors of mortality were unsuccessful procedure (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), history of prior MI (p = 0.003), multivessel disease (p = 0.006), and advancing age (p < 0.001), but not periprocedural MI.

CONCLUSIONS: The association of periprocedural MI with increased mortality during the first year following stent placement was confined to patients with unsuccessful procedures.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CK-MB = creatine kinase-MB
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. L. Dauerman
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pharmacology From a Triangle to a Square.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 698 - 700.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Larose
Below Radar: Contributions of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to the Understanding of Myonecrosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): 620 - 622.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D P Chew, D L Bhatt, A M Lincoff, K Wolski, and E J Topol
Clinical end point definitions after percutaneous coronary intervention and their relationship to late mortality: an assessment by attributable risk
Heart, July 1, 2006; 92(7): 945 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. L. Bhatt and E. J. Topol
Periprocedural Cardiac Enzyme Elevation Predicts Adverse Outcomes
Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 906 - 922.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. E. Cutlip and R. E. Kuntz
Cardiac Enzyme Elevation After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Not an Independent Predictor of Adverse Outcomes
Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 916 - 923.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. P.A. Ioannidis, E. Karvouni, and D. G. Katritsis
Creatine Kinase-MB Elevation Following Stent Implantation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1908 - 1908.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Jeremias, D. S. Baim, R. E. Kuntz, and D. E. Cutlip
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1908 - 1909.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement