|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1200-1209, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.048 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |

* Cardiovascular Research Foundation and the Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York, New York, USA
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
Manuscript received February 18, 2004; revised manuscript received June 1, 2004, accepted June 9, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. George Dangas, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 55 East 59th Street, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (Email: gdangas{at}crf.org).
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the safety of arteriotomy closure devices (ACDs) versus mechanical compression by meta-analysis in patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral coronary procedures.
BACKGROUND: Although ACDs are widely applied for hemostasis after percutaneous endovascular procedures, their safety is controversial.
METHODS: Randomized, case-control, and cohort studies comparing access-related complications using ACDs versus mechanical compression were analyzed. The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of vascular complications, including pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, retroperitoneal hematoma, femoral artery thrombosis, surgical vascular repair, access site infection, and blood transfusion.
RESULTS: A total of 30 studies involving 37,066 patients were identified. No difference in complication incidence between Angio-Seal and mechanical compression was revealed in the diagnostic (Dx) setting (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 10.0) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.12). Meta-analysis of randomized trials only showed a trend toward less complications using Angio-Seal in a PCI setting (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.04; p = 0.062). No differences were observed regarding Perclose in either Dx (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.24 to 9.47) or PCI (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.54) setting. An increased risk in complication rates using VasoSeal in the PCI setting (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.71) was found. The overall analysis favored mechanical compression over ACD (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.79).
CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of Dx angiography, the risk of access-site-related complications was similar for ACD compared with mechanical compression. In the setting of PCI, the rate of complications appeared higher with VasoSeal.
| ||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Applegate, M. T. Sacrinty, M. A. Kutcher, F. R. Kahl, S. K. Gandhi, R. M. Santos, and W. C. Little Trends in Vascular Complications After Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Via the Femoral Artery, 1998 to 2007 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Malik Closure devices for femoral punctures Heart, May 1, 2008; 94(5): 547 - 548. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Wilson and J. T. Willerson Myocardial Revascularization with Percutaneous Devices Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 573 - 598. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Dauerman, R. J. Applegate, and D. J. Cohen Vascular Closure Devices: The Second Decade J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): 1617 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. C. Lin, B. G. Rubin, and W. D. Middleton Vascular Injury From an Arterial Closure Device J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1441 - 1444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Calderon, E. Carter, K. M. Ramsey, J. A. Vande Waa, W. K. Green, and M. A. Alpert Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Complication of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Angiology, June 1, 2007; 58(3): 360 - 366. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Webber, J. Jang, S. Gustavson, and J. W. Olin Contemporary Management of Postcatheterization Pseudoaneurysms Circulation, May 22, 2007; 115(20): 2666 - 2674. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. S. Resnic The Case for Outpatient Coronary Intervention: Balancing Charges and Discharges Circulation, May 1, 2007; 115(17): 2248 - 2250. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Heyde, K. T. Koch, R. J. de Winter, M. G.W. Dijkgraaf, M. I. Klees, L. M. Dijksman, J. J. Piek, and J. G.P. Tijssen Randomized Trial Comparing Same-Day Discharge With Overnight Hospital Stay After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of the Elective PCI in Outpatient Study (EPOS) Circulation, May 1, 2007; 115(17): 2299 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Derham, J. F. Davies, R. Shahbazi, and S. Homer-Vanniasinkam Iatrogenic Limb Ischemia Caused by Angiography Closure Devices Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2007; 40(6): 492 - 494. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lins, D. Guffey, S. VanRiper, and E. Kline-Rogers Decreasing vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions: partnering to improve outcomes. Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2006; 26(6): 38 - 45. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lunden, A. Bengtson, and S. M. Lundgren Hours during and after coronary intervention and angiography. Clin Nurs Res, November 1, 2006; 15(4): 274 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Dangas Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 2096 - 2096. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Chou Vascular Complications and Arteriotomy Closure Devices During Percutaneous Coronary Procedures J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 2095 - 2096. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |