|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1175-1180, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.034 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |

,


* Hypertension and Cardiovascular Research, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
First Department of Internal Medicine St. Emeric Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Sections of Geriatrics, Clinical Hypertension Research and Family Medicine, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
|| Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical School, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Clinical Science, Medicine and Biostatistics, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden
¶ Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
# Department of Internal Medicine, Starnberg Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Starnberg, Germany
** Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione, University of Milan and Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
Manuscript received February 15, 2004; revised manuscript received June 3, 2004, accepted June 7, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Vasilios Papademetriou, Director, Hypertension & Cardiovascular Research, Co-Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Veterans Administration Medical Center, 50 Irving Street NW 151E, Washington, DC 20422 (Email: papavip{at}aol.com).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan can reduce the risk of stroke in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH).
BACKGROUND: Isolated systolic hypertension is the predominant form of hypertension in the elderly, and stroke is the most common cardiovascular (CV) complication.
METHODS: In the Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE), 4,964 patients age 70 to 89 years were randomly assigned to double-blind candesartan or placebo with open-label antihypertensive therapy (mostly thiazide diuretics) added as needed to control blood pressure. Of the 4,964 patients, 1,518 had ISH (systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg). The present study is a predefined subgroup analysis of outcome results in the ISH patients.
RESULTS: Of the ISH patients, 754 were randomized to the candesartan group and 764 to the control group. Over the study period, blood pressure was reduced by 22/6 mm Hg in the candesartan group and by 20/5 mm Hg in the control group (difference between treatments 2/1 mm Hg; p = 0.101 and 0.064). A total of 20 fatal/non-fatal strokes occurred in the candesartan group (7.2/1,000 patient-years) and 35 in the control group (12.5/1,000 patient-years); relative risk (RR) was 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 1.00), that is, a RR reduction of 42% (p = 0.050 unadjusted, p = 0.049 adjusted for baseline risk). There were no marked or statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in other CV end points or all-cause mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with ISH, antihypertensive treatment based on the ARB candesartan resulted in a significant 42% RR reduction in stroke in comparison with other antihypertensive treatment, despite little difference in blood pressure reduction.
| ||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members:, G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagard, G. Germano, G. Grassi, A. M. Heagerty, S. E. Kjeldsen, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., June 11, 2007; (2007) ehm236v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein and G. J. Hankey Advances in Primary Stroke Prevention Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 317 - 319. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Peralta, L. S. Hicks, G. M. Chertow, J. Z. Ayanian, E. Vittinghoff, F. Lin, and M. G. Shlipak Control of Hypertension in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States Hypertension, June 1, 2005; 45(6): 1119 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Fyhrquist, B. Dahlof, R. B. Devereux, S. E. Kjeldsen, S. Julius, G. Beevers, U. de Faire, H. Ibsen, K. Kristianson, O. Lederballe-Pedersen, et al. Pulse Pressure and Effects of Losartan or Atenolol in Patients With Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 580 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Williams Recent hypertension trials: Implications and controversies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2005; 45(6): 813 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, K. U. Knowlton, W. Y.W. Lew, J. Narula, D. Sahn, et al. Highlights of the year in JACC 2004 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 137 - 153. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D Coyle, S. F Gardner, and C M. White AUTHORS' REPLY: Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2004; 38(12): 2176 - 2177. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |