ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Performance of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk index in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-3 and -4
A simple index that predicts mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Stephen D. Wiviott, MD*, ,*,
David A. Morrow, MD, MPH*, ,
Paul D. Frederick, MPH, MBA ,
Robert P. Giugliano, SM, MD*, ,
C.Michael Gibson, MS, MD*, ,
Carolyn H. McCabe, BS*, ,
Christopher P. Cannon, MD*, ,
Elliott M. Antman, MD*, and
Eugene Braunwald, MD*,
* TIMI Study Group
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Ovation Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Manuscript received October 22, 2003;
revised manuscript received May 12, 2004,
accepted May 18, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stephen D. Wiviott, TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cardiovascular Division, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
(Email: swiviott{at}partners.org).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate a simple risk index based on age and vital signs in a community sample of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
BACKGROUND: A simple risk index based on age and vital signs (heart rate x [age/10]2/systolic blood pressure) developed from patients with STEMI accurately predicts mortality in clinical trials of fibrinolysis. The application of such a tool in an unselected population is necessary to evaluate its utility in clinical practice.
METHODS: To evaluate the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk index for routine practice, we tested it in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3 and -4. The risk index was evaluated as a continuous variable in patients with STEMI from NRMI and in subgroups based on age and reperfusion status.
RESULTS: A total of 153,486 patients with STEMI were eligible. As anticipated, STEMI patients in NRMI had a higher risk index profile, as compared with those in the clinical trial (median 26.9 vs. 20, p < 0.0001). Classification of NRMI patients with STEMI into risk groups revealed a significant graded relationship with mortality (0.9% to53.2%, ptrend < 0.0001, c statistic 0.79). The discriminatory capacity of the risk index was particularly strong in the 81,679 patients receiving reperfusion therapy (0.6% to60%, ptrend < 0.0001, c statistic 0.81). For the 71,807 patients not receiving reperfusion therapy, a strong graded relationship remained (1.9% to 52.2%, ptrend < 0.0001, c statistic 0.71). Among the elderly, although the distribution of scores was shifted toward higher risk, the performance remained (0% to 53.1%, ptrend< 0.0001, c statistic 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: A simple risk index from baseline clinical variables routinely obtained at the first patient encounter predicted mortality in a large unselected heterogeneous group of patients with STEMI.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CCP = Cardiovascular Cooperative Project | | HR = heart rate | | InTIME-II = Intravenous nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early trial | | IQR = interquartile range | | MI = myocardial infarction | | NRMI = National Registry of Myocardial Infarction | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | RT = reperfusion therapy | | SBP = systolic blood pressure | | STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Carver, S. Rafelt, A. H. Gershlick, K. L. Fairbrother, S. Hughes, R. Wilcox, and for the REACT Investigators
Longer-Term Follow-Up of Patients Recruited to the REACT (Rescue Angioplasty Versus Conservative Treatment or Repeat Thrombolysis) Trial.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 7, 2009;
54(2):
118 - 126.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C P Gale, S O M Manda, C F Weston, J S Birkhead, P D Batin, and A S Hall
Evaluation of risk scores for risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes in the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) database
Heart,
February 1, 2009;
95(3):
221 - 227.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ortolani, A. Marzocchi, C. Marrozzini, T. Palmerini, F. Saia, N. Taglieri, F. Baldazzi, G. Dall'Ara, P. Nardini, S. Gianstefani, et al.
Long-term effectiveness of early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents to real-world patients undergoing primary percutaneous interventions: results of a registry study in an ST-elevation myocardial infarction network
Eur. Heart J.,
January 1, 2009;
30(1):
33 - 43.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C P Gale, S O M Manda, P D Batin, C F Weston, J S Birkhead, and A S Hall
Predictors of in-hospital mortality for patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a real-world study using the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) database
Heart,
November 1, 2008;
94(11):
1407 - 1412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Alpert
A Plethora of Prognostic Pearls
Circulation,
September 23, 2008;
118(13):
1312 - 1313.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Testa, W.J. van Gaal, G.G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Abbate, P. Agostoni, R. Bhindi, and A.P. Banning
Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis
QJM,
May 1, 2008;
101(5):
387 - 395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior
Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time?
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2008;
29(3):
299 - 314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Oldgren, L. Wallentin, R. Afzal, J.-P. Bassand, A. Budaj, S. Chrolavicius, K. A.A. Fox, C. B. Granger, S. R. Mehta, P. Pais, et al.
Effects of fondaparinux in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction not receiving reperfusion treatment
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2008;
29(3):
315 - 323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Fox, J. S. Borer, A. J. Camm, N. Danchin, R. Ferrari, J. L. Lopez Sendon, P. G. Steg, J.-C. Tardif, L. Tavazzi, M. Tendera, et al.
Resting Heart Rate in Cardiovascular Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 28, 2007;
50(9):
823 - 830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ortolani, A. Marzocchi, C. Marrozzini, T. Palmerini, F. Saia, C. Serantoni, M. Aquilina, S. Silenzi, F. Baldazzi, D. Grosseto, et al.
Clinical impact of direct referral to primary percutaneous coronary intervention following pre-hospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J.,
July 1, 2006;
27(13):
1550 - 1557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Wiviott, D. A. Morrow, P. D. Frederick, E. M. Antman, and E. Braunwald
Application of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Index in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Evaluation of Patients in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 18, 2006;
47(8):
1553 - 1558.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, C. L. Grines, T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, and C. L. Grines
The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty
Circulation,
November 29, 2005;
112(22):
3509 - 3534.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Rothberg, C. Celestin, L. D. Fiore, E. Lawler, and J. R. Cook
Warfarin plus Aspirin after Myocardial Infarction or the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Meta-Analysis with Estimates of Risk and Benefit
Ann Intern Med,
August 16, 2005;
143(4):
241 - 250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|