|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:783-789, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.045 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
,*







* TIMI Study Group
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Ovation Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Manuscript received October 22, 2003; revised manuscript received May 12, 2004, accepted May 18, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stephen D. Wiviott, TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cardiovascular Division, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 (Email: swiviott{at}partners.org).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate a simple risk index based on age and vital signs in a community sample of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
BACKGROUND: A simple risk index based on age and vital signs (heart rate x [age/10]2/systolic blood pressure) developed from patients with STEMI accurately predicts mortality in clinical trials of fibrinolysis. The application of such a tool in an unselected population is necessary to evaluate its utility in clinical practice.
METHODS: To evaluate the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk index for routine practice, we tested it in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3 and -4. The risk index was evaluated as a continuous variable in patients with STEMI from NRMI and in subgroups based on age and reperfusion status.
RESULTS: A total of 153,486 patients with STEMI were eligible. As anticipated, STEMI patients in NRMI had a higher risk index profile, as compared with those in the clinical trial (median 26.9 vs. 20, p < 0.0001). Classification of NRMI patients with STEMI into risk groups revealed a significant graded relationship with mortality (0.9% to53.2%, ptrend < 0.0001, c statistic 0.79). The discriminatory capacity of the risk index was particularly strong in the 81,679 patients receiving reperfusion therapy (0.6% to60%, ptrend < 0.0001, c statistic 0.81). For the 71,807 patients not receiving reperfusion therapy, a strong graded relationship remained (1.9% to 52.2%, ptrend < 0.0001, c statistic 0.71). Among the elderly, although the distribution of scores was shifted toward higher risk, the performance remained (0% to 53.1%, ptrend< 0.0001, c statistic 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: A simple risk index from baseline clinical variables routinely obtained at the first patient encounter predicted mortality in a large unselected heterogeneous group of patients with STEMI.
| |||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Testa, W.J. van Gaal, G.G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Abbate, P. Agostoni, R. Bhindi, and A.P. Banning Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis QJM, May 1, 2008; 101(5): 387 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time? Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 299 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Oldgren, L. Wallentin, R. Afzal, J.-P. Bassand, A. Budaj, S. Chrolavicius, K. A.A. Fox, C. B. Granger, S. R. Mehta, P. Pais, et al. Effects of fondaparinux in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction not receiving reperfusion treatment Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 315 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fox, J. S. Borer, A. J. Camm, N. Danchin, R. Ferrari, J. L. Lopez Sendon, P. G. Steg, J.-C. Tardif, L. Tavazzi, M. Tendera, et al. Resting Heart Rate in Cardiovascular Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 823 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ortolani, A. Marzocchi, C. Marrozzini, T. Palmerini, F. Saia, C. Serantoni, M. Aquilina, S. Silenzi, F. Baldazzi, D. Grosseto, et al. Clinical impact of direct referral to primary percutaneous coronary intervention following pre-hospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1550 - 1557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Wiviott, D. A. Morrow, P. D. Frederick, E. M. Antman, and E. Braunwald Application of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Index in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Evaluation of Patients in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1553 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, C. L. Grines, T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, and C. L. Grines The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22): 3509 - 3534. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Rothberg, C. Celestin, L. D. Fiore, E. Lawler, and J. R. Cook Warfarin plus Aspirin after Myocardial Infarction or the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Meta-Analysis with Estimates of Risk and Benefit Ann Intern Med, August 16, 2005; 143(4): 241 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |