Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:594-601, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.075
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brembilla-Perrot, B.
Right arrow Articles by Juillière, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brembilla-Perrot, B.
Right arrow Articles by Juillière, Y.

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Differences in mechanisms and outcomes of syncope in patients with coronary disease or idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by electrophysiologic testing

Béatrice Brembilla-Perrot, MD*,*, Christine Suty-Selton, MD*, Daniel Beurrier, MD*, Pierre Houriez, MD*, Marc Nippert, MD*, Arnaud Terrier de la Chaise, MD*, Pierre Louis, MD*, Olivier Claudon, MD*, Marius Andronache, MD*, Ahmed Abdelaah, MD*, Nicolas Sadoul, MD* and Yves Juillière, MD*

* Department of Cardiology, CHU of Brabois, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France

Manuscript received September 23, 2003; revised manuscript received February 20, 2004, accepted March 2, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Béatrice Brembilla-Perrot, Cardiologie, CHU de Brabois, 54500 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France.
b.brembilla-perrot{at}chu-nancy.fr

This study was presented at the 75th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, November 2002, Chicago, IL.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the causes of syncope and the significance and differences in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, coronary disease, and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of and indications for an automated defibrillator could differ according to the cause of LV dysfunction.

METHODS: Electrophysiologic study, including atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, was performed in 119 patients with coronary disease (group I) and 61 patients with DCM (group II) with an left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and syncope. Patients were followed from one to six years (mean 4 ± 2 years).

RESULTS: Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced in 44 group I patients (37%) and 13 group II patients (21%); ventricular flutter (>270 beats/min) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 24 group I patients (19%) and 9 group II patients (15%); and various other arrhythmias were identified. Syncope remained unexplained in 34 group I patients (30%) and 16 group II patients (27%). Prognosis depended on the heart disease: VT or VF induction was a predictive factor of mortality in coronary disease and identified a group with high cardiac mortality (46%), compared with patients with a negative study, who had a lower mortality (6%; p < 0.001) than in other studies. Cardiac mortality was only correlated with LVEF in DCM.

CONCLUSIONS: Various causes could explain syncope in 70% of patients with coronary disease and DCM, but differences were noted: VT was frequent in coronary disease with a bad prognosis, and ischemia could explain syncope; in DCM, different causes such as atrial tachycardia could be responsible for syncope, but the prognosis only depended on LVEF.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AV = atrioventricular
  BP = blood pressure
  DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy
  EPS = electrophysiologic study
  HF = heart failure
  ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  LV = left ventricular
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  MI = myocardial infarction
  SVTA = supraventricular tachyarrhythmia
  VF = ventricular fibrillation
  VT = ventricular tachycardia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Developed in collaboration with, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Failure Association (HFA), and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Endorsed by the following societies, European Society of Emergency Medicine (EuSEM), European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM), European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), American Geriatrics Society (AGS), European Neurological Society (ENS), et al.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2009; 30(21): 2631 - 2671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
Béa. Brembilla-Perrot, I. Muhanna, M. Nippert, B. Popovic, D. Beurrier, P. Houriez, A. Terrier de la Chaise, O. Claudon, P. Louis, A. Abdelaal, et al.
Paradoxical effect of isoprenaline infusion
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(6): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement