Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:520-527, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.061
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, M.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, M.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Intracoronary brachytherapy after stenting de novo lesions in diabetic patients

Results of a randomized intravascular ultrasound study

Manel Sabaté, MD*,*, Gela Pimentel, MD*, Carlos Prieto, BSc*, JoséMaría Corral, MD*, Camino Bañuelos, MD*, Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD*, Fernando Alfonso, MD*, Rosana Hernández-Antolín, MD*, Javier Escaned, MD*, Panayotis Fantidis, MD*, Cristina Fernández, MD*, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, MD*, Raúl Moreno, MD* and Carlos Macaya, MD*

* San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Manuscript received August 8, 2003; revised manuscript received February 6, 2004, accepted February 10, 2004.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Manel Sabaté, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Plaza Cristo Rey s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
msabate.hcsc{at}salud.madrid.org

OBJECTIVES: We studied the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) after successful coronary stenting in diabetic patients with de novo lesions.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary brachytherapy has proven effective in preventing recurrences in patients with in-stent restenosis. However, the role of ICB for the treatment of de novo coronary stenoses remains controversial.

METHODS: Ninety-two patients were randomized to either ICB or no radiation after stenting. Primary end points were in-stent mean neointimal area (primary end point of efficacy) and minimal luminal area of the entire vessel segment (primary end point of effectiveness), as assessed by intravascular ultrasound at six-month follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was performed at the target, injured, irradiated, and entire vessel segments.

RESULTS: At follow-up, the in-stent mean neointimal area was 52% smaller in the ICB group (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the minimal luminal area of the vessel segment (4.5 ± 2.4 mm2 vs. 4.4 ± 2.1 mm2). Restenosis rates increased progressively by the analyzed segment in the ICB group: target (7.1% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.07), injured (9.5% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), irradiated (14.3% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), and vessel segment (23.8% vs. 25.6%, p = NS). At one year, 1 cardiac death, 6 myocardial infarctions (MIs) (3 due to late stent thrombosis), and 10 target vessel revascularizations (TVRs) (6 due to the edge effect) occurred in the ICB group, whereas in the nonradiation group, there were 11 TVRs and no deaths or MIs.

CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary brachytherapy significantly inhibited in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after stenting in diabetic patients. However, clinically this was counteracted by the occurrence of the edge effect and late stent thrombosis.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CK = creatine kinase
  ICB = intracoronary brachytherapy
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  MACE = major adverse cardiac events
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MLD = minimal luminal diameter
  NIH = neointimal hyperplasia
  QCA = quantitative coronary angiography
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Jimenez-Quevedo, M. Sabate, D. J. Angiolillo, M. A. Costa, F. Alfonso, J. A. Gomez-Hospital, R. Hernandez-Antolin, C. Banuelos, J. Goicolea, F. Fernandez-Aviles, et al.
Vascular Effects of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients: Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Results of the Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2172 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Sabate, P. Jimenez-Quevedo, D. J. Angiolillo, J. A. Gomez-Hospital, F. Alfonso, R. Hernandez-Antolin, J. Goicolea, C. Banuelos, J. Escaned, R. Moreno, et al.
Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Standard Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Patients: The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial
Circulation, October 4, 2005; 112(14): 2175 - 2183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. W. O'Neill, S. R. Dixon, and C. L. Grines
The year in interventional cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 1117 - 1134.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement