CARDIAC IMAGING
Comparative accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging and wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
Abdou Elhendy, MD, PhD, FACC*,
Edward L. O'Leary, MD, FACC*,
Feng Xie, MD*,
Anna C. McGrain, BSN, RN*,
James R. Anderson, PhD and
Thomas R. Porter, MD, FACC*,*
* Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Manuscript received May 6, 2004;
accepted August 25, 2004.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Thomas R. Porter, 981165 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-1165 (Email: trporter{at}unmc.edu).
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the accuracy of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and wall motion analysis (WMA) during submaximal and peak dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: The relative merits of MCE and WMA for the detection of CAD during DSE have not been studied in a large number of patients.
METHODS: We studied 170 patients who underwent dobutamine (up to 50 µg/kg/min)-atropine stress testing and coronary angiography. The WMA and MCE (using repeated boluses of Optison [Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, Missouri] or Definity [Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, New York]) were performed at rest, at intermediate stress (65% to 75% of maximal heart rate), and at peak stress. The diagnosis of CAD ( 50% stenosis in 1 coronary artery) was based on reversible wall motion and perfusion abnormalities.
RESULTS: Coronary artery disease was detected in 127 (75%) patients. Sensitivity of MCE was higher than that of WMA at maximal stress (91% vs. 70%; p = 0.001) and at intermediate stress (84% vs. 20%; p = 0.0001). Specificity was lower for MCE compared with WMA (51% vs. 74%; p = 0.01). Overall accuracy was higher for MCE than for WMA (81% vs. 71%; p = 0.01). Sensitivity for detection of CAD based on abnormalities in 2 vascular regions was higher for MCE than for WMA (67% vs. 28%; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of inducible perfusion abnormalities occur at an intermediate phase of the stress test, without wall motion abnormalities. Myocardial contrast echocardiography provides better sensitivity than WMA, particularly in patients with submaximal stress and in identifying patients with multivessel CAD.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CI = confidence interval | | DSE = dobutamine stress echocardiography | | ECG = electrocardiogram | | LAD = left anterior descending | | LCx = left circumflex | | MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography | | RCA = right coronary artery | | WMA = wall motion analysis |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Cosyns, G. Van Camp, S. Droogmans, C. Weytjens, D. Schoors, and P. Lancellotti
Analysis of regional wall motion during contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography: effect of contrast imaging settings
Eur J Echocardiogr,
December 1, 2009;
10(8):
956 - 960.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Lonnebakken, E. M. Staal, O. Bleie, E. Strand, O. K. Nygard, and E. Gerdts
Quantitative contrast stress echocardiography in assessment of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease
Eur J Echocardiogr,
October 1, 2009;
10(7):
858 - 864.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gaibazzi, A. Squeri, D. Ardissino, and C. Reverberi
Safety of contrast flash-replenishment stress echocardiography in 500 patients with a chest pain episode of undetermined origin within the last 5 days
Eur J Echocardiogr,
August 1, 2009;
10(6):
726 - 732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Senior, H. Becher, M. Monaghan, L. Agati, J. Zamorano, J. L. Vanoverschelde, and P. Nihoyannopoulos
Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
March 1, 2009;
10(2):
194 - 212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Rana, R. Swallow, R. Senior, and K. Greaves
Detection of myocardial ischaemia caused by coronary artery-left ventricular fistulae using myocardial contrast echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
January 1, 2009;
10(1):
175 - 177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Flachskampf, J.-U. Voigt, and W. G. Daniel
CHAPTER 4 Cardiac Ultrasound
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine,
January 1, 2009;
2(1):
med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Aggeli, G Giannopoulos, G Roussakis, E Christoforatou, G Marinos, C Toli, C Pitsavos, and C Stefanadis
Safety of myocardial flash-contrast echocardiography in combination with dobutamine stress testing for the detection of ischaemia in 5250 studies
Heart,
December 1, 2008;
94(12):
1571 - 1577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gebker, C. Jahnke, R. Manka, A. Hamdan, B. Schnackenburg, E. Fleck, and I. Paetsch
Additional Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging During Dobutamine Stress Magnetic Resonance for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
September 1, 2008;
1(2):
122 - 130.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Dall'Armellina, T. M. Morgan, S. Mandapaka, W. Ntim, J. J. Carr, C. A. Hamilton, J. Hoyle, H. Clark, P. Clark, K. M. Link, et al.
Prediction of Cardiac Events in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With Dobutamine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Wall Motion Score Index
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 22, 2008;
52(4):
279 - 286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kaul
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: A 25-Year Retrospective
Circulation,
July 15, 2008;
118(3):
291 - 308.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hacker, H. X. Hoyer, C. Uebleis, P. Ueberfuhr, S. Foerster, C. La Fougere, and H.-U. Stempfle
Quantitative assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with conventional echocardiographic analyses and [Tc99m]-sestamibi SPECT
Eur J Echocardiogr,
July 1, 2008;
9(4):
494 - 500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Xie, S. Dodla, E. O'Leary, and T. R. Porter
Detection of subendocardial ischemia in the left anterior descending coronary artery territory with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
May 1, 2008;
1(3):
271 - 278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Pellikka and S. L. Mulvagh
Echocardiography contrast for image optimization: beyond confidence, it is a matter of accuracy.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
March 1, 2008;
1(2):
153 - 155.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior
Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time?
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2008;
29(3):
299 - 314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Tsutsui, F. Xie, D. Cloutier, S. Kalvaitis, A. Elhendy, and T. R. Porter
Real-time dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion echocardiography predicts outcome in the elderly
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2008;
29(3):
377 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hoffmann, A. C. Borges, J. D. Kasprzak, S. von Bardeleben, C. Firschke, C. Greis, M. Engelhardt, H. Becher, and J. L. Vanoverschelde
Analysis of myocardial perfusion or myocardial function for detection of regional myocardial abnormalities. An echocardiographic multicenter comparison study using myocardial contrast echocardiography and 2D echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
December 1, 2007;
8(6):
438 - 448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Rakhit, H. Becher, M. Monaghan, P. Nihoyannopoulis, and R. Senior
The clinical applications of myocardial contrast echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
June 1, 2007;
8(3):
s24 - s29.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Bax, S. E. Inzucchi, R. O. Bonow, J. D. Schuijf, M. R. Freeman, E. J. Barrett, and on behalf of the Global Dialogue Group for the Eva
Cardiac Imaging for Risk Stratification in Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
May 1, 2007;
30(5):
1295 - 1304.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Dijkmans, R. Senior, H. Becher, T. R. Porter, K. Wei, C. A. Visser, and O. Kamp
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion: The Evidence So Far
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 5, 2006;
48(11):
2168 - 2177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Elhendy, J M Tsutsui, E L O'Leary, F Xie, F Majeed, and T R Porter
Evaluation of restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with previous percutaneous coronary interventions by dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging
Heart,
October 1, 2006;
92(10):
1480 - 1483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Elhendy and T. R. Porter
Myocardial contrast quantitation during stress echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr,
June 1, 2006;
7(3):
185 - 186.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Weyman
The Year in Echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 21, 2006;
47(4):
856 - 863.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Tsutsui, A. Elhendy, F. Xie, E. O'Leary, A. C. McGrain, and T. R. Porter
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 15, 2005;
46(10):
1963 - 1964.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. H. Marwick
Contrast Stress Echocardiography: Completing the Picture From Image Enhancement to Improved Accuracy and Prognostic Insight
Circulation,
September 6, 2005;
112(10):
1382 - 1383.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Tsutsui, A. Elhendy, J. R. Anderson, F. Xie, A. C. McGrain, and T. R. Porter
Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Contrast Perfusion Echocardiography
Circulation,
September 6, 2005;
112(10):
1444 - 1450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J D Schuijf, L J Shaw, W Wijns, H J Lamb, D Poldermans, A de Roos, E E van der Wall, and J J Bax
Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: differing modalities
Heart,
August 1, 2005;
91(8):
1110 - 1117.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Elhendy, J. M. Tsutsui, E. L. O'Leary, F. Xie, A. C. McGrain, and T. R. Porter
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes by Dobutamine Stress Real-Time Myocardial Contrast Perfusion Imaging
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2005;
28(7):
1662 - 1667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Tsutsui, A. Elhendy, F. Xie, E. L. O'Leary, A. C. McGrain, and T. R. Porter
Safety of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 19, 2005;
45(8):
1235 - 1242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Leong-Poi, M. P. Coggins, J. Sklenar, A. R. Jayaweera, X.-Q. Wang, and S. Kaul
Role of collateral blood flow in the apparent disparity between the extent of abnormal wall thickening and perfusion defect size during acute myocardial infarction and demand ischemia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 15, 2005;
45(4):
565 - 572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, K. U. Knowlton, W. Y.W. Lew, J. Narula, D. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the year in JACC 2004
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 4, 2005;
45(1):
137 - 153.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|