|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1677-1682, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.042 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |



,*
* Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan
Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Lyon, France
Division of Cardiology, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
Manuscript received July 30, 2003; revised manuscript received October 1, 2003, accepted December 9, 2003.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Nagib S. Dahdah, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Department of Cardiology, 3175 Cote St. Catherine, Montreal QC H3T1C-5, Canada.
ndahdah{at}pol.net
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the incidence, nature, and predisposing factors of atrioventricular block (AVB) associated with closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) using the Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO).
BACKGROUND: In our institution, 162 patients underwent ASD closure using ASO between December 1997 and December 2001. This includes small children with large defects.
METHODS: Electrocardiographic tracings during ASO implantation and at follow-up visits were reviewed. Anatomic characteristics and device size were assessed as potential risk factors for AVB.
RESULTS: Ten patients (6.2%) presented with new-onset (n = 9) or aggravation of preexisting (n = 1) AVB. Atrioventricular block occurred during the procedure (n = 3) or was first noted one day to one week later (n = 7). Patients had first-degree (n = 4), second-degree Wenckebach (n = 4), or third-degree (n = 2) AVB, with no symptoms or hemodynamic compromise. First-degree AVB persisted in two patients at 12 and 33 months of follow-up, whereas most recovered normal AV conduction within one (n = 7) or six months (n = 1). A larger shunt (Qp/Qs ratio 2.8 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) and device size (24 ± 5 vs. 19 ± 6 mm, p < 0.01) were the only determinant factors for AVB. A device size
19 mm was used in 90% (9 of 10) of patients who developed AVB, as compared with 49% of those without AVB (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Closure of ASDs using the large ASO can be associated with the development of AV block and mandate a closer follow-up. In our series, however, all AVBs resolved or improved spontaneously, with no recurrence at mid-term follow-up.
| ||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Jux, H. Bertram, P. Wohlsein, M. Bruegmann, and T. Paul Interventional Atrial Septal Defect Closure Using a Totally Bioresorbable Occluder Matrix: Development and Preclinical Evaluation of the BioSTAR Device J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 161 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Santoro, M Pascotto, S Caputo, F Cerrato, M Cappelli Bigazzi, M T Palladino, C Iacono, M Carrozza, M G Russo, and R Calabro Similar cardiac remodelling after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in children and young adults Heart, July 1, 2006; 92(7): 958 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Kaplan and P. Denes Reversible atrioventricular block and the Amplatzer device J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1306 - 1306. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dahdah and J. Miro Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1306 - 1306. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |