Advertisement







Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1617-1622, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.067
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenspon, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenspon, A. J.

CLINICAL STUDY: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

Predictors of stroke in patients paced for sick sinus syndrome

Arnold J. Greenspon, MD, FACC*,*, Robert G. Hart, MD{dagger}, David Dawson, MD{ddagger}, Anne S. Hellkamp, MS§, Marc Silver, MD, FACC||, Greg C. Flaker, MD, FACC, Eleanor Schron, MS, RN#, Lee Goldman, MD, FACC**, Kerry L. Lee, PhD§, Gervasio A. Lamas, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger} MOST Study Investigators

* Division of Cardiology, Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
{dagger} University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, USA
{ddagger} Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
§ Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
|| Gastonia Memorial Hospital, Gastonia, North Carolina, USA
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
# Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
** University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Mount Sinai Medical Center and the University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami Beach, Florida, USA

Manuscript received May 5, 2003; revised manuscript received August 19, 2003, accepted September 24, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Arnold J. Greenspon, Jefferson Heart Institute, Jefferson Medical College, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
arnold.greenspon{at}jefferson.edu

OBJECTIVES: This study was an analysis of factors associated with stroke in a population of patients paced for sinus node dysfunction in a large prospective clinical trial (Mode Selection Trial [MOST]).

BACKGROUND: The effects of dual-chamber versus single-chamber ventricular pacing on subsequent stroke in patients with sinus node dysfunction are not known.

METHODS: A total of 2,010 patients with sinus node dysfunction were randomized to ventricular or dual-chamber pacing and followed for a median of 33.1 months.

RESULTS: The median participant age was 74 years. During 5,664 patient-years of follow-up, 90 strokes (11 hemorrhagic) occurred. By life-table analysis, the rate of stroke was 2.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6 to 2.9) at one year and 5.8% (95% CI 4.5 to 7.1) at four years. The incidence of stroke was not significantly different in dual-chamber (4%) as compared with ventricular-paced patients (4.9%) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.25, p = 0.36). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that significant predictors of stroke included prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, Caucasian race, hypertension, prior systemic embolism, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (p < 0.05); pacing mode remained non-significant after adjustment for these factors (p = 0.37). Clinically reported atrial fibrillation after implantation was a risk factor for stroke in this cohort after adjustment for other predictors of stroke (p = 0.042, HR 1.68 [95% CI 1.02 to 2.76]).

CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics, but not mode of pacing, were associated with subsequent stroke in patients paced for sinus node dysfunction.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AF = atrial fibrillation
  CI = confidence interval
  CTOPP = Canadian Trial Of Physiologic Pacing
  DDDR = dual-chamber rate-modulated
  MOST = Mode Selection Trial
  NYHA = New York Heart Association
  TIA = transient ischemic attack
  VVIR = ventricular rate-modulated




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. M. Fored, F. Granath, F. Gadler, P. Blomqvist, J. Rynder, C. Linde, A. Ekbom, and M. Rosenqvist
Atrial vs. dual-chamber cardiac pacing in sinus node disease: a register-based cohort study
Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 825 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Doufekias, A. Z. Segal, and J. R. Kizer
Cardiogenic and aortogenic brain embolism.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1049 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. Colivicchi, A. Bassi, M. Santini, and C. Caltagirone
Discontinuation of Statin Therapy and Clinical Outcome After Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): 2652 - 2657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Capucci, M. Santini, L. Padeletti, M. Gulizia, G. Botto, G. Boriani, R. Ricci, S. Favale, F. Zolezzi, N. Di Belardino, et al.
Monitored Atrial Fibrillation Duration Predicts Arterial Embolic Events in Patients Suffering From Bradycardia and Atrial Fibrillation Implanted With Antitachycardia Pacemakers
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2005; 46(10): 1913 - 1920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement