Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1335-1342, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.035
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orford, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orford, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, D. R.

STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPERS

Routine intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention

A critical reappraisal

James L. Orford, MBChB, MPH, FESC, FACC*, Amir Lerman, MD, FACC* and David R. Holmes, MD, FACC*,*

* Department of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Manuscript received November 11, 2003; revised manuscript received December 8, 2003, accepted December 9, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. David R. Holmes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
dholmes{at}mayo.edu

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has played an integral role in the evolution of interventional cardiology. However, routine IVUS guidance of coronary stent implantation is not supported by a critical reappraisal of the available evidence. Although there is a trend toward a benefit with respect to target lumen revascularization favoring IVUS-guided coronary stent implantation, it is likely that this effect is driven by improved outcomes in small vessels, long coronary stenoses, and possibly saphenous vein graft interventions. No consistent trend in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction is apparent. Furthermore, the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of IVUS should be taken into account when considering the goals, risks, benefits, and alternatives to such a treatment strategy.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  DES = drug-eluting stent(s)
  FFR = fractional flow reserve
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MLD = minimum lumen diameter
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  TLR = target lumen revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Tobis, B. Azarbal, and L. Slavin
Assessment of Intermediate Severity Coronary Lesions in the Catheterization Laboratory
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 27, 2007; 49(8): 839 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. R. Crouse III
Thematic review series: Patient-Oriented Research. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art
J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1677 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement