CLINICAL RESEARCH: ARRHYTHMIAS
The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function
Wanchun Tang, MD* ,*,
Max Harry Weil, MD, PhD*,
Shijie Sun, MD*,
Dawn Jorgenson, PhD ,
Carl Morgan, MSEE,
Kada Klouche, MD* and
David Snyder, MSEE
* Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Palm Springs, California, USA
Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Philips Medical Systems, Seattle, Washington, USA
Manuscript received August 7, 2003;
revised manuscript received October 14, 2003,
accepted October 20, 2003.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Wanchun Tang, The Institute of Critical Care Medicine, 1695 North Sunrise Way, Building #3, Palm Springs, California 92262-5309, USA.
drsheart{at}aol.com
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of biphasic truncated exponential waveform design on survival and post-resuscitation myocardial function after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF).
BACKGROUND: Biphasic waveforms are more effective than monophasic waveforms for successful defibrillation, but optimization of energy and current levels to minimize post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction has been largely unexplored. We examined a low-capacitance waveform typical of low-energy application (low-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEL]; 100 µF,  200 J) and a high-capacitance waveform typical of high-energy application (high-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEH]; 200 µF,  200 J).
METHODS: Four groups of anesthetized 40- to 45-kg pigs were investigated. After 7 min of electrically induced VF, a 15-min resuscitation attempt was made using sequences of up to three defibrillation shocks followed by 1 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Animals were randomized to BTEL at 150 J or 200 J or to BTEH at 200 J or 360 J.
RESULTS: Resuscitation was unsuccessful in three of the five animals treated with BTEH at 200 J. All other attempts were successful. Significant therapy effects were observed for survival (p = 0.035), left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), stroke volume (p < 0.001), fractional area change (p < 0.001), cardiac output (p = 0.044), and mean aortic pressure (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic outcomes were negatively associated with energy and average current but positively associated with peak current. Peak current was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Maximum survival and minimum myocardial dysfunction were observed with the low-capacitance 150-J waveform, which delivered higher peak current while minimizing energy and average current.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BTEH | = high-energy biphasic truncated exponential | | BTEL | = low-energy biphasic truncated exponential | | CO | = cardiac output | | CPR | = cardiopulmonary resuscitation | | EF | = ejection fraction | | FAC | = fractional area change | | LV | = left ventricle/ventricular | | SV | = stroke volume | | VF | = ventricular fibrillation |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
W. Tang, M. H. Weil, and R. D. White
Letter by Tang et al Regarding Article, "BIPHASIC Trial: A Randomized Comparison of Fixed Lower Versus Escalating Higher Energy Levels for Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest"
Circulation,
November 6, 2007;
116(19):
e522 - e522.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Kudenchuk, L. A. Cobb, M. K. Copass, M. Olsufka, C. Maynard, and G. Nichol
Transthoracic Incremental Monophasic Versus Biphasic Defibrillation by Emergency Responders (TIMBER): A Randomized Comparison of Monophasic With Biphasic Waveform Ascending Energy Defibrillation for the Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest due to Ventricular Fibrillation
Circulation,
November 7, 2006;
114(19):
2010 - 2018.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. El-Menyar
The Resuscitation Outcome: Revisit the Story of the Stony Heart
Chest,
October 1, 2005;
128(4):
2835 - 2846.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A A J Adgey, M S Spence, and S J Walsh
Theory and practice of defibrillation: (2) defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation
Heart,
January 1, 2005;
91(1):
118 - 125.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Mason
The truth about shocking ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 18, 2004;
44(4):
853 - 854.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
