|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:328-336, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.032 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
Manuscript received April 25, 2003; revised manuscript received August 25, 2003, accepted September 9, 2003.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Kenneth N. Giedd, Division of Cardiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, USA.
kng1{at}columbia.edu
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. Currently, more than one million coronary angioplasty and stent implantation procedures are performed annually. Although increasingly complex lesions and higher risk patients are being successfully treated percutaneously, restenosis and disease progression continue to cause significant morbidity. Restenosis occurs in approximately one-third of patients, one-half of who remain asymptomatic, while disease progression occurs at rates approaching 7% per year. Despite technological advances, unadjusted mortality rates have actually increased since the mid-1980s, and the current annual risk of a major adverse cardiac event following PCI is 5% to 7%. Although randomized clinical trials are needed to more definitively show a benefit, when performed six or more months following PCI, myocardial perfusion imaging reliably identifies patients most at risk of a poor long-term outcome. Directed reintervention can have a salutary impact on the prognosis of these patients. In view of recent data showing a positive impact of imaging and reintervention in patients after PCI, current guidelines should be reassessed.
| ||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Zellweger, C. Kaiser, H. P. Brunner-La Rocca, P. T. Buser, S. Osswald, P. Weiss, J. Mueller-Brand, M. E. Pfisterer, and for the BASKET Investigators Value and Limitations of Target-Vessel Ischemia in Predicting Late Clinical Events After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 550 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Salahas, A. Vrahatis, I. Karabinos, I. Antonellis, G. Ifantis, I. Gavaliatsis, P. Anthopoulos, and A. Tavernarakis Success, Safety, and Efficacy of Implantation of Diamond-Like Carbon-Coated Stents Angiology, April 1, 2007; 58(2): 203 - 210. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Elhendy, J M Tsutsui, E L O'Leary, F Xie, F Majeed, and T R Porter Evaluation of restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with previous percutaneous coronary interventions by dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1480 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kitta, T. Nakamura, Y. Kodama, H. Takano, K. Umetani, D. Fujioka, Y. Saito, K.-i. Kawabata, J.-e. Obata, Y. Ichigi, et al. Endothelial Vasomotor Dysfunction in the Brachial Artery Is Associated With Late In-Stent Coronary Restenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 648 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Shrive, B. J. Manns, P. D. Galbraith, M. L. Knudtson, W. A. Ghali, and for The APPROACH Investigators Economic evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stents Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 1, 2005; 172(3): 345 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |