JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:194-199, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.029
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poornima, I. G.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poornima, I. G.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, R. J.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Utility of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with low-risk treadmill scores

Indu G. Poornima, MD*, Todd D. Miller, MD, FACC*, Timothy F. Christian, MD, FACC*, David O. Hodge, MS{dagger}, Kent R. Bailey, PhD{dagger} and Raymond J. Gibbons, MD, FACC*,*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{dagger} Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Manuscript received March 4, 2003; revised manuscript received July 23, 2003, accepted September 9, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Raymond J. Gibbons, Nuclear Cardiology, Charlton 2, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
gibbons.raymond{at}mayo.edu

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a previously validated clinical score (CS) could identify patients with a low-risk Duke treadmill score who had a higher risk of adverse events and, therefore, in whom myocardial perfusion imaging would be valuable for risk stratification.

BACKGROUND: Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend using a standard exercise test without imaging as the initial test in patients who have an interpretable electrocardiogram and are able to exercise.

METHODS: We studied 1,461 symptomatic patients with low-risk Duke treadmill scores (≥5) who underwent myocardial perfusion imaging. The CS was derived by assigning one point to each of the following variables: typical angina, history of myocardial infarction, diabetes, insulin use, male gender, and each decade of age over 40 years. A CS cutoff ≥5 or <5 was used to categorize patients as high risk (n = 303 [21%]) or low risk (n = 1,158 [79%]). Perfusion scans were categorized as low, intermediate, or high risk on the basis of the global stress score (GSS).

RESULTS: High-risk scans were more common in patients with a high-risk CS (26.4% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.0001). The CS and GSS were significant independent predictors of cardiac death. However, in patients with a low CS, seven-year cardiac survival was excellent, regardless of the GSS (99% for normal scans, 99% for mildly abnormal scans, and 99% for severely abnormal scans). In contrast, patients with a high CS had a lower seven-year survival rate (92%), which varied with GSS (94% for normal scans, 94% for mildly abnormal scans, and 84% for severely abnormal scans; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with low-risk Duke treadmill scores and low clinical risk, myocardial perfusion imaging is of limited prognostic value. In patients with low-risk Duke treadmill scores and high clinical risk, annual cardiac mortality (>1%) is not low, and myocardial perfusion imaging has independent prognostic value.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACC/AHA = American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CS = clinical score
  ECG = electrocardiogram/electrocardiographic
  GDS = global difference score
  GRS = global rest score
  GSS = global stress score
  MI = myocardial infarction
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, T. D. Miller, D. Hodge, L. Urban, P. A. Araoz, P. Pellikka, and R. B. McCully
Application of Appropriateness Criteria to Stress Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Sestamibi Studies and Stress Echocardiograms in an Academic Medical Center
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2008; 51(13): 1283 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. D. Metz, M. Beattie, R. Hom, R. F. Redberg, D. Grady, and K. E. Fleischmann
The Prognostic Value of Normal Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Exercise Echocardiography: A Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 227 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. S. Berman, R. Hachamovitch, L. J. Shaw, J. D. Friedman, S. W. Hayes, L. E.J. Thomson, D. S. Fieno, G. Germano, N. D. Wong, X. Kang, et al.
Roles of Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Noninvasive Risk Stratification and a Conceptual Framework for the Selection of Noninvasive Imaging Tests in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1107 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. V. Anand, E. Lim, A. Lahiri, and J. J. Bax
The role of non-invasive imaging in the risk stratification of asymptomatic diabetic subjects
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 905 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. S. Berman, R. Hachamovitch, L. J. Shaw, J. D. Friedman, S. W. Hayes, L. E.J. Thomson, D. S. Fieno, G. Germano, P. Slomka, N. D. Wong, et al.
Roles of Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Assessment of Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 74 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. F. Di Carli and R. Hachamovitch
Should we screen for occult coronary artery disease among asymptomatic patients with diabetes?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 50 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, K. U. Knowlton, W. Y.W. Lew, J. Narula, D. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the year in JACC 2004
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 137 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons and P. A. Araoz
The year in cardiac imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 1937 - 1944.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Abidov, R. Hachamovitch, A. Rozanski, S. W. Hayes, M. M. Santos, M. G. Sciammarella, I. Cohen, J. Gerlach, J. D. Friedman, G. Germano, et al.
Prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1062 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. S. Berman, N. D. Wong, H. Gransar, R. Miranda-Peats, J. Dahlbeck, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, X. Kang, D. Polk, R. Hachamovitch, et al.
Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 923 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.