Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1799-1806, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.069
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yano, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yano, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, K.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Myocardial contrast echocardiography with a new calibration method can estimate myocardial viabilityin patients with myocardial infarction

Akio Yano, MD*, Hiroshi Ito, MD, FACC*,*, Katsuomi Iwakura, MD*, Ryusuke Kimura, MD*, Kouji Tanaka, MD*, Atsunori Okamura, MD*, Shigeo Kawano, MD*, Tohru Masuyama, MD, FACC{dagger} and Kenshi Fujii, MD*

* Division of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan
{dagger} Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

Manuscript received February 23, 2003; revised manuscript received September 24, 2003, accepted October 20, 2003.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Hiroshi Ito, Division of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan.
itomd{at}osk4.3web.ne.jp

OBJECTIVES: We have developed a novel calibration technique applicable for myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). We assessed the value of this technique in the recognition of myocardial infarction (MI) and its spatial extent, and we also performed a validation study in normal subjects.

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of contrast intensity (CI) among myocardial segments limits the clinical use of MCE.

METHODS: We performed MCE with a slow-bolus injection of Levovist and recorded end-systolic harmonic power Doppler images at intervals of four heart beats in 15 normal volunteers and 30 patients with MI. We divided the left ventricular (LV) wall into 12 segments and placed the region of interest in the subendocardial region in each segment and in the adjacent LV cavity. We measured calibrated CI (dB) by subtracting the cavity CI from myocardial CI.

RESULTS: The mean intersegmental difference in myocardial CI was 15.8 dB at baseline, whereas it was reduced to 6.3 dB after calibration (p < 0.01). Calibrated CI was higher in the kinetic segments than in the akinetic segments (–14.5 ± 2.3 dB [range –18.7 to –9.9 dB] vs. –22.5 ± 2.6 dB [–27.8 to –17.7 dB], p < 0.001), and –18.0 dB was the optimal cutoff point to discriminate these from each other. Color-coded mapping of calibrated CI may identify the spatial extent of persistently akinetic myocardium as areas of calibrated CI of ≤–18.0 dB.

CONCLUSIONS: This new calibration method reduces the intersegmental difference in CI in normal subjects. Calibrated CI provides an estimate of persistently akinetic myocardium in patients with MI, and its color-coded mapping is comprehensive and identifies the spatial extent of MI.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CI = contrast intensity
  HPD = harmonic power Doppler
  LV = left ventricular
  MBV = myocardial blood volume
  MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  ROI = region of interest




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Miyagawa, T. Masai, H. Fukuda, T. Yamauchi, K. Iwakura, H. Itoh, and Y. Sawa
Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in aortic stenosis: myocardial contrast echocardiography study.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 87(3): 715 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Yoshifuku, S. Chen, E. McMahon, J. Korinek, A. Yoshikawa, I. Ochiai, P. P. Sengupta, and M. Belohlavek
Parametric Detection and Measurement of Perfusion Defects in Attenuated Contrast Echocardiographic Images
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 739 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Indermuhle, R. Vogel, P. Meier, S. Wirth, R. Stoop, M. G. Mohaupt, and C. Seiler
The relative myocardial blood volume differentiates between hypertensive heart disease and athlete's heart in humans
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1571 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L Galiuto
Quantifying myocardial perfusion using contrast echocardiography
Heart, February 1, 2005; 91(2): 133 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, O. Ben-Yehuda, D. Berman, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. D. Knoke, K. U. Knowlton, W. Y.W. Lew, J. Narula, D. Sahn, et al.
Highlights of the year in JACC 2004
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 137 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement