|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1780-1787, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.068 © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |







* Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York, New York, USA
William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
|| Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
¶ Virginia Beach General Hospital, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA
# Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
** Moses Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA

Washington Adventist Hospital, Tacoma Park, Maryland, USA

St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Manuscript received August 13, 2003; revised manuscript received October 13, 2003, accepted October 20, 2003.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gregg W. Stone, The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 55 East 59th Street, 6th Floor, New York City, New York 10022, USA.
gstone{at}crf.org
OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the effect of intravenous beta-blockers administered before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on survival and myocardial recovery after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
BACKGROUND: Studies of primary PCI but not thrombolysis have suggested that beta-blocker administration before reperfusion may enhance survival. Whether oral beta-blocker use before admission modulates this effect is unknown.
METHODS: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial randomized 2,082 AMI patients to either stenting or balloon angioplasty, each ± abciximab. In accordance with the protocol, intravenous beta-blockers were administered before PCI in the absence of contraindications.
RESULTS: A total of 1,136 patients (54.5%, BB+ group) received beta-blockers before PCI, whereas 946 (45.5%, BB group) did not. The 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the BB+ group than in the BB group (1.5% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03), an effect entirely limited to patients who had not been receiving beta-blockers before admission (1.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.007). In contrast, no survival benefit with pre-procedural beta-blockers was observed in patients receiving beta-blockers at home (3.3% vs. 1.9%, respectively, p = 0.47). By multivariate analysis, pre-procedural beta-blocker use was an independent predictor of lower 30-day mortality among patients without previous beta-blocker therapy (relative risk = 0.38 [95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.87], p = 0.02). The improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to seven months was also greater after intravenous beta-blockers (3.8% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01), an effect limited to patients not receiving oral beta-blockers before admission.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI, myocardial recovery is enhanced and 30-day mortality is reduced with pre-procedural intravenous beta-blockade, effects confined to patients untreated with oral beta-blocker medication before admission.
| ||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Ibanez, S. Prat-Gonzalez, W. S. Speidl, G. Vilahur, A. Pinero, G. Cimmino, M. J. Garcia, V. Fuster, J. Sanz, and J. J. Badimon Early Metoprolol Administration Before Coronary Reperfusion Results in Increased Myocardial Salvage: Analysis of Ischemic Myocardium at Risk Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Circulation, June 12, 2007; 115(23): 2909 - 2916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Keeley and L. D. Hillis Primary PCI for Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation N. Engl. J. Med., January 4, 2007; 356(1): 47 - 54. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Atar, M. E. Korkmaz, I. A. Atar, O. Gulmez, B. Ozin, H. Bozbas, T. Erol, A. Aydinalp, A. Yildirir, M. Yucel, et al. Effects of metoprolol therapy on cardiac troponin-I levels after elective percutaneous coronary interventions Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2006; 27(5): 547 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. B. Mrdovic Is the level of evidence for the use of beta-blockers in acute myocardial infarction satisfactory enough? Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 118 - 119. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 5: Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-55 - III-72. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. O'Neill, S. R. Dixon, and C. L. Grines The year in interventional cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 1117 - 1134. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Gersh, G. W. Stone, H. D. White, and D. R. Holmes Jr Pharmacological Facilitation of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is the Slope of the Curve the Shape of the Future? JAMA, February 23, 2005; 293(8): 979 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., September 1, 2004; 9(5): e5 - e5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |