HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by John, A. S. Articles by Hamm, C. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by John, A. S. Articles by Hamm, C. W.

CLINICAL STUDY

Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis

How does it compare to current diagnostic standards?

Anna S. John, MD^*,*, Thorsten Dill, MD^*, Roland R. Brandt, MD, FACC^*, Matthias Rau, MD^*, Wolfgang Ricken, MD^*, Georg Bachmann, MD and Christian W. Hamm, MD, FACC^*

^* Departments of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany
Radiology, Kerckhoff Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany
CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Manuscript received May 13, 2002; revised manuscript received April 9, 2003, accepted April 24, 2003.

^* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Anna S. John, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, United Kingdom.
a.john{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance (MR) planimetry of the aortic valve area (AVA) may prove to be a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tool in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis, and how the results compare with current diagnostic standards.

BACKGROUND: Current standard techniques for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis include transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as well as transvalvular pressure measurements during cardiac catheterization.

METHODS: Forty consecutive patients underwent cardiac catheterization, TEE, and MR. The AVA was estimated by direct planimetry (MR, TEE) or calculated indirectly via the peak systolic transvalvular gradient (catheter). Pressure gradients from cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography were also compared.

RESULTS: By MR, the mean AVA_max was 0.91 ± 0.25 cm²; by TEE, AVA_max was 0.89 ± 0.28 cm²; and by catheter, the AVA was calculated as 0.64 ± 0.26 cm². Mean absolute differences in AVA were 0.02 cm² for MR versus TEE, 0.27 cm² for MR versus catheter, and 0.25 cm² for TEE versus catheter. Correlations for AVA_max were r = 0.96 between MR and TEE, r = 0.47 between TEE and catheter, and r = 0.44 between MR and catheter. The correlation between Doppler and catheter gradients was r = 0.71.

CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance planimetry of the AVA correlates well with TEE and less well with the catheter-derived AVA. Invasive and Doppler pressure correlated less well than those obtained from planimetric techniques. Magnetic resonance planimetry of the AVA may provide an accurate, non-invasive, well-tolerated alternative to invasive techniques and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   ACC/AHA   American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association   AF   atrial fibrillation   AS   aortic stenosis   TTE   transthoracic echocardiography   LV   left ventricle/ventricular   AVA   aortic valve area   MR   magnetic resonance   TEE   transesophageal echocardiography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. De Mozzi, U. G. Longo, G. Galanti, and N. Maffulli Bicuspid aortic valve: a literature review and its impact on sport activity Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2008; 85(1): 63 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Debl, B Djavidani, S Buchner, N Heinicke, S Fredersdorf, J Haimerl, F Poschenrieder, S Feuerbach, G A J Riegger, and A Luchner Assessment of the anatomic regurgitant orifice in aortic regurgitation: a clinical magnetic resonance imaging study Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): e8 - e8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-P. Laissy, D. Messika-Zeitoun, J.-M. Serfaty, V. Sebban, E. Schouman-Claeys, B. Iung, and A. Vahanian Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1121 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-C. Pouleur, J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, A. Pasquet, J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde, and B. L. Gerber Aortic Valve Area Assessment: Multidetector CT Compared with Cine MR Imaging and Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Goland, A. Trento, K. Iida, L. S C Czer, M. De Robertis, T. Z Naqvi, K. Tolstrup, T. Akima, H. Luo, and R. J Siegel Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach Heart, July 1, 2007; 93(7): 801 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Abbara, A. J. Pena, P. Maurovich-Horvat, J. Butler, D. E. Sosnovik, A. Lembcke, R. C. Cury, U. Hoffmann, M. Ferencik, and T. J. Brady Feasibility and Optimization of Aortic Valve Planimetry with MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 356 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Stout and C. M. Otto Indications for Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 14 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Bouvier, D. Logeart, J.-L. Sablayrolles, J. Feignoux, C. Scheuble, T. Touche, G. Thabut, and A. Cohen-Solal Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2006; 27(24): 3033 - 3038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Debl, B Djavidani, S Buchner, C Lipke, W Nitz, S Feuerbach, G Riegger, and A Luchner Delayed hyperenhancement in magnetic resonance imaging of left ventricular hypertrophy caused by aortic stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: visualisation of focal fibrosis Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1447 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Feuchtner, W. Dichtl, G. J. Friedrich, M. Frick, H. Alber, T. Schachner, J. Bonatti, A. Mallouhi, T. Frede, O. Pachinger, et al. Multislice Computed Tomography for Detection of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis and Quantification of Severity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1410 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Djavidani, K. Debl, M. Lenhart, J. Seitz, C. Paetzel, F. X. Schmid, W. R. Nitz, S. Feuerbach, G. Riegger, and A. Luchner Planimetry of Mitral Valve Stenosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 2048 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. V. Freeman and C. M. Otto Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies Circulation, June 21, 2005; 111(24): 3316 - 3326. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1940 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Kupfahl, M Honold, G Meinhardt, H Vogelsberg, A Wagner, H Mahrholdt, and U Sechtem Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 893 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Friedrich, J. Schulz-Menger, and R. Dietz Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 2148 - 2148. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. John and T. Dill Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 2148 - 2149. [Full Text] [PDF]