CLINICAL STUDY
Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis
How does it compare to current diagnostic standards?
Anna S. John, MD* ,*,
Thorsten Dill, MD*,
Roland R. Brandt, MD, FACC*,
Matthias Rau, MD*,
Wolfgang Ricken, MD*,
Georg Bachmann, MD and
Christian W. Hamm, MD, FACC*
* Departments of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany
Radiology, Kerckhoff Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany
CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Manuscript received May 13, 2002;
revised manuscript received April 9, 2003,
accepted April 24, 2003.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Anna S. John, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, United Kingdom. a.john{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance (MR) planimetry of the aortic valve area (AVA) may prove to be a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tool in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis, and how the results compare with current diagnostic standards.
BACKGROUND: Current standard techniques for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis include transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as well as transvalvular pressure measurements during cardiac catheterization.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients underwent cardiac catheterization, TEE, and MR. The AVA was estimated by direct planimetry (MR, TEE) or calculated indirectly via the peak systolic transvalvular gradient (catheter). Pressure gradients from cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography were also compared.
RESULTS: By MR, the mean AVAmax was 0.91 ± 0.25 cm2; by TEE, AVAmax was 0.89 ± 0.28 cm2; and by catheter, the AVA was calculated as 0.64 ± 0.26 cm2. Mean absolute differences in AVA were 0.02 cm2 for MR versus TEE, 0.27 cm2 for MR versus catheter, and 0.25 cm2 for TEE versus catheter. Correlations for AVAmax were r = 0.96 between MR and TEE, r = 0.47 between TEE and catheter, and r = 0.44 between MR and catheter. The correlation between Doppler and catheter gradients was r = 0.71.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance planimetry of the AVA correlates well with TEE and less well with the catheter-derived AVA. Invasive and Doppler pressure correlated less well than those obtained from planimetric techniques. Magnetic resonance planimetry of the AVA may provide an accurate, non-invasive, well-tolerated alternative to invasive techniques and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ACC/AHA | | American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association | | AF | | atrial fibrillation | | AS | | aortic stenosis | | TTE | | transthoracic echocardiography | | LV | | left ventricle/ventricular | | AVA | | aortic valve area | | MR | | magnetic resonance | | TEE | | transesophageal echocardiography |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Schoenhagen, E. M. Tuzcu, S. R. Kapadia, M. Y. Desai, and L. G. Svensson
Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation
Eur. Heart J.,
September 1, 2009;
30(17):
2079 - 2086.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, A. Rudolph, R. Wassmuth, S. Bohl, E. E. Buschmann, H. Abdel-Aty, R. Dietz, and J. Schulz-Menger
Feasibility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to Assess the Orifice Area of Aortic Bioprostheses
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
September 1, 2009;
2(5):
397 - 404.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Cawley, J. H. Maki, and C. M. Otto
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Valvular Heart Disease: Technique and Validation
Circulation,
January 27, 2009;
119(3):
468 - 478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. LaBounty, B. Sundaram, P. Agarwal, W. A. Armstrong, E. A. Kazerooni, and E. Yamada
Aortic Valve Area on 64-MDCT Correlates with Transesophageal Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
December 1, 2008;
191(6):
1652 - 1658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Dal-Bianco, B. K. Khandheria, F. Mookadam, F. Gentile, and P. P. Sengupta
Management of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 14, 2008;
52(16):
1279 - 1292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Buchner, K. Debl, F. Poschenrieder, S. Feuerbach, G. A.J. Riegger, A. Luchner, and B. Djavidani
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Direct Assessment of Anatomic Regurgitant Orifice in Mitral Regurgitation
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
September 1, 2008;
1(2):
148 - 155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. De Mozzi, U. G. Longo, G. Galanti, and N. Maffulli
Bicuspid aortic valve: a literature review and its impact on sport activity
Br. Med. Bull.,
March 1, 2008;
85(1):
63 - 85.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Debl, B Djavidani, S Buchner, N Heinicke, S Fredersdorf, J Haimerl, F Poschenrieder, S Feuerbach, G A J Riegger, and A Luchner
Assessment of the anatomic regurgitant orifice in aortic regurgitation: a clinical magnetic resonance imaging study
Heart,
March 1, 2008;
94(3):
e8 - e8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Laissy, D. Messika-Zeitoun, J.-M. Serfaty, V. Sebban, E. Schouman-Claeys, B. Iung, and A. Vahanian
Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography
Heart,
September 1, 2007;
93(9):
1121 - 1125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-C. Pouleur, J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, A. Pasquet, J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde, and B. L. Gerber
Aortic Valve Area Assessment: Multidetector CT Compared with Cine MR Imaging and Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography
Radiology,
September 1, 2007;
244(3):
745 - 754.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Goland, A. Trento, K. Iida, L. S C Czer, M. De Robertis, T. Z Naqvi, K. Tolstrup, T. Akima, H. Luo, and R. J Siegel
Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach
Heart,
July 1, 2007;
93(7):
801 - 807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Abbara, A. J. Pena, P. Maurovich-Horvat, J. Butler, D. E. Sosnovik, A. Lembcke, R. C. Cury, U. Hoffmann, M. Ferencik, and T. J. Brady
Feasibility and Optimization of Aortic Valve Planimetry with MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
February 1, 2007;
188(2):
356 - 360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. K. Stout and C. M. Otto
Indications for Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis
J Intensive Care Med,
January 1, 2007;
22(1):
14 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Bouvier, D. Logeart, J.-L. Sablayrolles, J. Feignoux, C. Scheuble, T. Touche, G. Thabut, and A. Cohen-Solal
Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography
Eur. Heart J.,
December 2, 2006;
27(24):
3033 - 3038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Debl, B Djavidani, S Buchner, C Lipke, W Nitz, S Feuerbach, G Riegger, and A Luchner
Delayed hyperenhancement in magnetic resonance imaging of left ventricular hypertrophy caused by aortic stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: visualisation of focal fibrosis
Heart,
October 1, 2006;
92(10):
1447 - 1451.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Feuchtner, W. Dichtl, G. J. Friedrich, M. Frick, H. Alber, T. Schachner, J. Bonatti, A. Mallouhi, T. Frede, O. Pachinger, et al.
Multislice Computed Tomography for Detection of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis and Quantification of Severity
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 4, 2006;
47(7):
1410 - 1417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Djavidani, K. Debl, M. Lenhart, J. Seitz, C. Paetzel, F. X. Schmid, W. R. Nitz, S. Feuerbach, G. Riegger, and A. Luchner
Planimetry of Mitral Valve Stenosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 21, 2005;
45(12):
2048 - 2053.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. V. Freeman and C. M. Otto
Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies
Circulation,
June 21, 2005;
111(24):
3316 - 3326.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report
Eur. Heart J.,
November 1, 2004;
25(21):
1940 - 1965.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Kupfahl, M Honold, G Meinhardt, H Vogelsberg, A Wagner, H Mahrholdt, and U Sechtem
Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques
Heart,
August 1, 2004;
90(8):
893 - 901.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Friedrich, J. Schulz-Menger, and R. Dietz
Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 2, 2004;
43(11):
2148 - 2148.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. John and T. Dill
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 2, 2004;
43(11):
2148 - 2149.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|