JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:1273-1279, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00120-7
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hochman, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hochman, J. S.

CLINICAL STUDY: ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES/INFARCTION

Cardiogenic shock caused by right ventricular infarction

A report from the SHOCK registry

Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC*,*, Jane A. Leopold, MD, FACC*, Eric Bates, MD, FACC{dagger}, Lisa A. Mendes, MD, FACC*, Lynn A. Sleeper, ScD{ddagger}, Harvey White, DSc§, Ravin Davidoff, MB, BCh*, Jean Boland, MD||, Sharada Modur, MS{ddagger}, Robert Forman, MD, FACC and Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC#

* Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
{dagger} University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
{ddagger} New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA
§ Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
|| Centre Hospitalier Regional Citadelle, Liege, Belgium
Weiler Hospital of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
# St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York, USA

Manuscript received February 4, 2002; revised manuscript received October 17, 2002, accepted October 31, 2002.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Alice K. Jacobs, Boston Medical Center, Section of Cardiology, 88 East Newton Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
alice.jacobs{at}bmc.org

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock due to predominant right ventricular (RV) infarction.

BACKGROUND: Although RV infarction has been shown to have favorable long-term outcomes, the influence of RV infarction on mortality in cardiogenic shock is unknown.

METHODS: We evaluated 933 patients in cardiogenic shock due to predominant RV (n = 49) or left ventricular (LV) failure (n = 884) in the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial registry.

RESULTS: Patients with predominant RV shock were younger, with a lower prevalence of previous MI (25.5 vs. 40.1%, p = 0.047), anterior MI, and multivessel disease (34.8 vs. 77.8%, p < 0.001) and a shorter median time between the index MI and the diagnosis of shock (2.9 vs. 6.2 h, p = 0.003) in comparison to patients with LV shock. In-hospital mortality was 53.1% versus 60.8% (p = 0.296) for patients with predominant RV and LV shock, respectively, and the influence of revascularization on mortality was not different between groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that RV shock was not an independent predictor of lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 2.13).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the younger age, lower rate of anterior MI, and higher prevalence of single-vessel coronary disease of RV compared with LV shock patients, and their similar benefit from revascularization, mortality is unexpectedly high in patients with predominant RV shock and similar to patients with LV shock.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CK
  creatine kinase
  ECG
  electrocardiographic
  LAD
  left anterior descending coronary artery
  LV
  left ventricular
  MI
  myocardial infarction
  RCA
  right coronary artery
  RV
  right ventricular
  SHOCK
  SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK?




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. R. Reynolds and J. S. Hochman
Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes
Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): 686 - 697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Chockalingam, G. Gnanavelu, T. Subramaniam, S. Dorairajan, and V. Chockalingam
Right Ventricular Myocardial Infarction: Presentation and Acute Outcomes
Angiology, July 1, 2005; 56(4): 371 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
C. S. Duvernoy and E. R. Bates
Management of Cardiogenic Shock Attributable to Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Reperfusion Era
J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 188 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
T. Carter and K. Ellis
Right-ventricular infarction.
Crit. Care Nurse, April 1, 2005; 25(2): 52 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
I. Inglessis, J. T. Shin, J. J. Lepore, I. F. Palacios, W. M. Zapol, K. D. Bloch, and M. J. Semigran
Hemodynamic effects of inhaled nitric oxide in right ventricular myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 793 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. S. Hochman
Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Expanding the Paradigm
Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 2998 - 3002.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Goldstein
Right versus left ventricular shock: A tale of two ventricles
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 16, 2003; 41(8): 1280 - 1282.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.