CLINICAL STUDY
Left ventricular septal and apex pacing for optimal pump function in canine hearts
Maaike Peschar, PhD*,
Hans de Swart, MD ,
Koen J. Michels, MSc, Ing ,
Robert S. Reneman, MD, PhD* and
Frits W. Prinzen, PhD*,*
* Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Medtronic, Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Manuscript received May 29, 2002;
revised manuscript received October 8, 2002,
accepted November 27, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Frits W. Prinzen, Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
frits.prinzen{at}fys.unimaas.nl
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) pump function is optimal when pacing is performed at the LV near the sites where the impulses exit the Purkinje system.
BACKGROUND: Pacing at the conventional site, the right ventricular (RV) apex, adversely affects hemodynamics. During normal sinus rhythm (SR), electrical activation of the working myocardium starts at the LV septal endocardium and spreads from apex to base.
METHODS: Experiments were conducted in anesthetized open-chest dogs with normal ventricular conduction to investigate hemodynamic effects of pacing at various epicardial LV sites, the RV apex, and combinations of these sites (n = 11) and of RV and LV septal pacing (n = 8). The LV septal endocardium was reached via the RV by puncturing through the septum with a barbed electrode. Left ventricular systolic (LVdP/dtpos and stroke work) and diastolic (LVdP/dtneg and Tau) function were assessed using pressure-volume relations (conductance catheter technique).
RESULTS: Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function were highly dependent on the site of pacing, but not on QRS duration. Left ventricular function was maintained at SR level during LV septal, LV apex, and multisite pacing, was moderately depressed during pacing at epicardial LV free wall sites, and was most severely depressed during RV apex pacing. On average, RV septal pacing did not improve LV function, compared with RV apex pacing, but in each experiment one (variable) RV pacing site was found, which only moderately reduced LV function.
CONCLUSIONS: During ventricular pacing, LV pump function is maintained best (i.e., at SR level) when pacing at the LV septum or LV apex, potentially because pacing from these sites creates a physiological propagation of electrical conduction.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AV | = atrioventricular | | LV | = left ventricle/ventricular | | LVdP/dtneg | = maximal rate of fall of left ventricular pressure | | LVdP/dtpos | = maximal rate of rise of left ventricular pressure | | RV | = right ventricle/ventricular | | SR | = sinus rhythm | | SV | = stroke volume | | SW | = stroke work |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
C. van Deursen, I. E. van Geldorp, L. M. Rademakers, A. van Hunnik, M. Kuiper, C. Klersy, A. Auricchio, and F. W. Prinzen
Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing Improves Resynchronization Therapy in Canine Left Bundle-Branch Hearts
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
October 1, 2009;
2(5):
580 - 587.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W. Mills, R. N. Cornelussen, L. J. Mulligan, M. Strik, L. M. Rademakers, N. D. Skadsberg, A. van Hunnik, M. Kuiper, A. Lampert, T. Delhaas, et al.
Left Ventricular Septal and Left Ventricular Apical Pacing Chronically Maintain Cardiac Contractile Coordination, Pump Function and Efficiency
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
October 1, 2009;
2(5):
571 - 579.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bertini, N. A. Marsan, V. Delgado, R. J. van Bommel, G. Nucifora, C. J. W. Borleffs, G. Boriani, M. Biffi, E. R. Holman, E. E. van der Wall, et al.
Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular twist.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 29, 2009;
54(14):
1317 - 1325.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. O. Sweeney and F. W. Prinzen
Ventricular Pump Function and Pacing: Physiological and Clinical Integration
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
June 1, 2008;
1(2):
127 - 139.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Auricchio and F. W. Prinzen
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The More Pacing Sites, the Better the Outcome?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 15, 2008;
51(15):
1463 - 1465.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Kavanagh, I. Belenkie, and H. J. Duff
Transmural temporospatial left ventricular activation during pacing from different sites: potential implications for optimal pacing
Cardiovasc Res,
January 1, 2008;
77(1):
81 - 88.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Y. Vanagt, F. W. Prinzen, and T. Delhaas
Reversal of Pacing-Induced Heart Failure by Left Ventricular Apical Pacing
N. Engl. J. Med.,
December 20, 2007;
357(25):
2637 - 2638.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Johnson, H. K. Kim, M. Tanabe, J. Gorcsan, D. Schwartzman, S. G. Shroff, and M. R. Pinsky
Differential effects of left ventricular pacing sites in an acute canine model of contraction dyssynchrony
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 2007;
293(5):
H3046 - H3055.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Vernooy, R. N.M. Cornelussen, X. A.A.M. Verbeek, W. Y.R. Vanagt, A. van Hunnik, M. Kuiper, T. Arts, H. J.G.M. Crijns, and F. W. Prinzen
Cardiac resynchronization therapy cures dyssynchronopathy in canine left bundle-branch block hearts
Eur. Heart J.,
September 1, 2007;
28(17):
2148 - 2155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. B. Tournoux, C. Alabiad, D. Fan, A. A. Chen, M. Chaput, E. K. Heist, T. Mela, M. Mansour, V. Reddy, J. N. Ruskin, et al.
Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome
Eur. Heart J.,
May 1, 2007;
28(9):
1143 - 1148.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. H. Helm, M. Byrne, P. A. Helm, S. K. Daya, N. F. Osman, R. Tunin, H. R. Halperin, R. D. Berger, D. A. Kass, and A. C. Lardo
Three-Dimensional Mapping of Optimal Left Ventricular Pacing Site for Cardiac Resynchronization
Circulation,
February 27, 2007;
115(8):
953 - 961.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. P. Sengupta, J. Korinek, M. Belohlavek, J. Narula, M. A. Vannan, A. Jahangir, and B. K. Khandheria
Left Ventricular Structure and Function: Basic Science for Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 21, 2006;
48(10):
1988 - 2001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Lieberman, L. Padeletti, J. Schreuder, K. Jackson, A. Michelucci, A. Colella, W. Eastman, S. Valsecchi, and D. A. Hettrick
Ventricular Pacing Lead Location Alters Systemic Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Function in Patients With and Without Reduced Ejection Fraction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 17, 2006;
48(8):
1634 - 1641.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. O. Sweeney and F. W. Prinzen
A New Paradigm for Physiologic Ventricular Pacing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 17, 2006;
47(2):
282 - 288.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Dilaveris, A. Pantazis, G. Giannopoulos, A. Synetos, J. Gialafos, and C. Stefanadis
Upgrade to biventricular pacing in patients with pacing-induced heart failure: can resynchronization do the trick?
Europace,
January 1, 2006;
8(5):
352 - 357.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Y. Vanagt, X. A. Verbeek, T. Delhaas, M. Gewillig, L. Mertens, P. Wouters, B. Meyns, W. J. Daenen, and F. W. Prinzen
Acute Hemodynamic Benefit of Left Ventricular Apex Pacing in Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
March 1, 2005;
79(3):
932 - 936.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. G. Stevenson and M. O. Sweeney
Single Site Left Ventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization
Circulation,
April 13, 2004;
109(14):
1694 - 1696.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
