JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:843-848, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02961-3
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiggers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Thuesen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiggers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Thuesen, L.

CLINICAL STUDY: CARDIAC IMAGING

Electromechanical mapping versus positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

Henrik Wiggers, MD, PhD*,*, Hans Erik Bøtker, MD, PhD*, Peter Søgaard, MD, PhD*, Anne Kaltoft, MD*, Flemming Hermansen, MD{dagger}, Won Yong Kim, MD, PhD*, Lars Krusell, MD* and Leif Thuesen, MD, PhD*

* Department of Cardiology, Skejby Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
{dagger} The PET Center, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Manuscript received May 21, 2002; revised manuscript received September 10, 2002, accepted September 26, 2002.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Henrik Wiggers, Department of Cardiology, Skejby Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
henrikwiggers{at}dadlnet.dk

OBJECTIVES: We compared catheter-based electromechanical mapping (NOGA system, Biosense-Webster, Haifa, Israel) with positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for prediction of reversibly dysfunctional myocardium (RDM) and irreversibly dysfunctional myocardium (IDM) in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Furthermore, we established the optimal discriminatory value of NOGA measurements for distinction between RDM and IDM.

BACKGROUND: The NOGA system can detect viable myocardium but has not been used for prediction of post-revascularization contractile function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS: Twenty patients (19 males, age [mean ± SD] 60 ± 16 years, ejection fraction [EF] 29 ± 6%) underwent viability testing with NOGA and PET or SPECT before revascularization. Left ventricular function was studied at baseline and six months after revascularization.

RESULTS: The EF increased to 34 ± 13% at six months (p < 0.05 vs. baseline). The 58 RDM and 57 IDM regions differed with regard to unipolar voltage amplitude (UVA) (9.2 ± 3.9 mV vs. 7.6 ± 4.0 mV, p < 0.05), normalized UVA (106 ± 54% vs. 75 ± 39%, p < 0.05), and tracer uptake (76 ± 17% vs. 60 ± 20%, p < 0.05). The NOGA local shortening did not distinguish between RDM and IDM (6.4 ± 5.8% vs. 5.4 ± 6.6%). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, myocardial tracer uptake had better diagnostic performance than UVA (area under curve [AUC] ± SE: 0.82 ± 0.04 vs. 0.63 ± 0.05, p < 0.05) and normalized UVA (AUC ± SE: 0.70 ± 0.05, p < 0.05). Optimal threshold was defined as the value yielding sensitivity = specificity for prediction of RDM. Sensitivity and specificity were 59% at a UVA of 8.4 mV, 65% at a normalized UVA of 83%, and 78% at a tracer uptake of 69%.

CONCLUSIONS: The NOGA system may discriminate RDM from IDM with optimal discriminatory values for UVA and normalized UVA of 8.4 mV and 83%, respectively. However, the diagnostic performance does not reach the level obtained by PET and SPECT in patients with severe heart failure.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AUC
  area under curve
  EF
  ejection fraction
  FDG
  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
  IDM
  irreversibly dysfunctional myocardium
  LS
  local shortening
  LV
  left ventricle/ventricular
  LVEF
  left ventricular ejection fraction
  MRI
  magnetic resonance imaging
  PCI
  percutaneous coronary intervention
  PET
  positron emission tomography
  RDM
  reversibly dysfunctional myocardium
  ROC
  receiver operating characteristic
  SPECT
  single photon emission computed tomography
  UVA
  unipolar voltage amplitude




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
E. C. Perin and G. V. Silva
Stem cell therapy in end-stage ischaemic heart failure: a catheter-based therapeutic strategy targeting myocardial viability
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2006; 8(suppl_H): H46 - H51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. de Silva, L. F. Gutierrez, A. N. Raval, E. R. McVeigh, C. Ozturk, and R. J. Lederman
X-Ray Fused With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (XFM) to Target Endomyocardial Injections: Validation in a Swine Model of Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2342 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Kastrup, E. Jorgensen, A. Ruck, K. Tagil, D. Glogar, W. Ruzyllo, H. E. Botker, D. Dudek, V. Drvota, B. Hesse, et al.
Direct intramyocardial plasmid vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 gene therapy in patients with stable severe angina pectoris: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study: The Euroinject One trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 982 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Graf, M. Gyongyosi, A. Khorsand, S. G. Nekolla, C. Pirich, K. Kletter, R. Dudczak, D. Glogar, G. Porenta, and H. Sochor
Electromechanical Properties of Perfusion/Metabolism Mismatch: Comparison of Nonfluoroscopic Electroanatomic Mapping with 18F-FDG PET
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1611 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.