HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Costantini, C. O. Articles by Leon, M. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Costantini, C. O. Articles by Leon, M. B.

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Intravascular brachytherapy for native coronary ostial in-stent restenotic lesions

Costantino O. Costantini, MD^*, Alexandra J. Lansky, MD^*,*, Gary S. Mintz, MD, FACC^*, Kazuyuki Shirai, MD^*, George Dangas, MD, FACC^*, Roxana Mehran, MD, FACC^*, Martin Fahy, PhD^*, Steven Slack, MS^*, Maria Coral, MD^*, Paul S. Teirstein, MD, FACC^*, Ron Waksman, MD, FACC, Gregg Stone, MD, FACC^*, Jeffrey Moses, MD, FACC^* and Martin B. Leon, MD, FACC^*

^* Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology Division) from the Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA

Manuscript received September 4, 2002; revised manuscript received January 21, 2003, accepted January 30, 2003.

^* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Alexandra J. Lansky, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 55 East 59th Street, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10022, USA.
alansky{at}crf.org

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the effects of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) on ostial in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis has a high recurrence rate after percutaneous reintervention. The recurrence rate of ostial ISR lesions and the impact of VBT remain unknown.

METHODS: We evaluated 133 patients with native coronary ostial ISR from a pooled database of 990 patients enrolled in randomized VBT trials. Independent quantitative angiography was performed at baseline and follow-up in 45 gamma, 27 beta, and 61 placebo patients.

RESULTS: Binary restenosis was significantly higher in placebo than radiated patients (75.4% vs. 17.8% in gamma vs. 22.2% in beta, p < 0.0001). The treatment effect of both gamma (odds ratio [OR] 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 to 0.17) and beta VBT (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.31) was maintained after controlling for differences in baseline lesion length. Proximal and distal radiation edge restenosis rates were similar among the groups. Vascular brachytherapy of true aorto-ostial lesions (n = 34) was similarly beneficial: restenosis rates of placebo versus gamma or beta patients of 83.3% versus 6.7% versus 28.6%, p = 0.0002.

CONCLUSIONS: Conventional treatment of ostial ISR is associated with a recurrence rate of over 75%. Vascular brachytherapy with either gamma or beta sources results in significant and similar reductions in restenosis compared with placebo. Similar benefits after VBT prevail in true aorto-ostial lesions.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CI   confidence interval   DS   diameter stenosis   GM   geographic miss   92Ir   iridium 92   ISR   in-stent restenosis   MLD   minimal lumen diameter   OR   odds ratio   PCI   percutaneous coronary intervention   QCA   quantitative coronary angiography   RD   reference diameter   90Sr/90Y   strontium 90/yttrium 90   VBT   vascular brachytherapy