|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1339-1346 © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
* Second Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
Manuscript received October 4, 2001; revised manuscript received May 7, 2002, accepted June 27, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Tetsuji Miura, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South-1 West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8543 Japan.
miura{at}sapmed.ac.jp
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify the role of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K+ (KATP) channels in the no-reflow phenomenon and in its extension by hypercholesterolemia.
BACKGROUND: The no-reflow phenomenon is an important target of therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction, but its mechanism remains unclear.
METHODS: The left circumflex coronary artery was occluded for 30 or 60 min and reperfused in rabbit hearts in situ. The no-reflow zone, area at risk, and infarct size were determined by thioflavin-S, Evans blue, and tetrazolium staining, respectively. No-reflow zone size was expressed as a percentage of infarct size (%NR/IS). Hypercholesterolemia was induced by two weeks of cholesterol-enriched diet.
RESULTS: A KATP channel blocker, glibenclamide (0.3 mg/kg), increased %NR/IS after 30-min ischemia/90-min reperfusion from 33.6 ± 1.9% to 45.9 ± 1.6% and %NR/IS after 60-min ischemia/90-min reperfusion from 32.8 ± 3.4% to 46.1 ± 1.7%. However, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), a nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor, and nicorandil, a hybrid of KATP channel opener and nitrate, failed to significantly modify %NR/IS. Hypercholesterolemia increased %NR/IS to 61.6 ± 0.6%, which was not further enlarged by glibenclamide, and delayed infarct healing during the subsequent five days of reperfusion. These effects of hypercholesterolemia were significantly suppressed by nicorandil. Neither glibenclamide, L-NMMA, nicorandil, nor hypercholesterolemia modified infarct size.
CONCLUSIONS: The KATP channel activation, but not NO, is a major mechanism of protection against microvascular injury, causing the no-reflow phenomenon in the heart. Suppression of KATP channel opening may underlie the hypercholesterolemia-induced extension of no-reflow, which delays infarct healing.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhao, Y. Yang, W. Pei, Y. Sun, M Zhai, Y. Liu, and R. Gao Carvedilol reduces myocardial no-reflow by decreasing endothelin-1 via activation of the ATP-sensitive K+ channel Perfusion, March 1, 2008; 23(2): 111 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Hale, A. Mehra, J. Leeka, and R. A. Kloner Postconditioning fails to improve no reflow or alter infarct size in an open-chest rabbit model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H421 - H425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reffemann and R. A. Kloner Microvascular Alterations After Temporary Coronary Artery Occlusion: The No-Reflow Phenomenon Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 163 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Galiuto Optimal therapeutic strategies in the setting of post-infarct no reflow: the need for a pathogenetic classification Heart, February 1, 2004; 90(2): 123 - 125. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Brady and A. Jovanovic The sulfonylurea controversy: Much ado about nothing or cause for concern? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1022 - 1025. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |