CLINICAL STUDY
Left ventricular outflow tract mean systolic acceleration as a surrogatefor the slope of the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship
Fabrice Bauer, MD*,
Michael Jones, MD ,
Takahiro Shiota, MD, FACC*,*,
Michael S. Firstenberg, MD*,
Jian Xin Qin, MD*,
Hiroyuki Tsujino, BSc*,
Yong Jin Kim, MD*,
Marta Sitges, MD*,
Lisa A. Cardon, RDCS*,
Arthur D. Zetts and
James D. Thomas, MD, FACC*
* Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Manuscript received November 8, 2001;
revised manuscript received May 6, 2002,
accepted June 27, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Takahiro Shiota, Department of Cardiology, Desk F15, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. Shiotat{at}ccf.org
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to analyze left ventricular outflow tract systolic acceleration (LVOTAcc) during alterations in left ventricular (LV) contractility and LV filling.
BACKGROUND: Most indexes described to quantify LV systolic function, such as LV ejection fraction and cardiac output, are dependent on loading conditions.
METHODS: In 18 sheep (4 normal, 6 with aortic regurgitation, and 8 with old myocardial infarction), blood flow velocities through the LVOT were recorded using conventional pulsed Doppler. The LVOTAcc was calculated as the aortic peak velocity divided by the time to peak flow; LVOTAcc was compared with LV maximal elastance (Em) acquired by conductance catheter under different loading conditions, including volume and pressure overload during an acute coronary occlusion (n = 10). In addition, a clinically validated lumped-parameter numerical model of the cardiovascular system was used to support our findings.
RESULTS: Left ventricular Em and LVOTAcc decreased during ischemia (1.67 ± 0.67 mm Hg·ml1 before vs. 0.93 ± 0.41 mm Hg·ml1 during acute coronary occlusion [p < 0.05] and 7.9 ± 3.1 m·s2 before vs. 4.4 ± 1.0 m·s2 during coronary occlusion [p < 0.05], respectively). Left ventricular outflow tract systolic acceleration showed a strong linear correlation with LV Em (y = 3.84x + 1.87, r = 0.85, p < 0.001). Similar findings were obtained with the numerical modeling, which demonstrated a strong correlation between predicted and actual LV Em (predicted = 0.98 [actual] 0.01, r = 0.86). By analysis of variance, there was no statistically significant difference in LVOTAcc under different loading conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: For a variety of hemodynamic conditions, LVOTAcc was linearly related to the LV contractility index LV Em and was independent of loading conditions. These findings were consistent with numerical modeling. Thus, this Doppler index may serve as a good noninvasive index of LV contractility.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ANOVA | | analysis of variance | | EF | | ejection fraction | | Em | | maximal elastance | | LV | | left ventricle/ventricular | | LVOT | | left ventricular outflow tract | | LVOTAcc | | left ventricular outflow tract systolic acceleration | | MI | | myocardial infarction | | PV | | peak aortic flow velocity | | t-PV | | time to peak velocity | | t-PVcor | | the heart rate-corrected time of time to peak velocity |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.-Y. Choi, B. W. Choi, S.-A. Kim, S. J. Rhee, C. Y. Shim, Y. J. Kim, S.-M. Kang, J.-W. Ha, and N. Chung
Patterns of late gadolinium enhancement are associated with ventricular stiffness in patients with advanced non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
Eur J Heart Fail,
June 1, 2009;
11(6):
573 - 580.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Thomas and Z. B. Popovic
Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Cardiac Ultrasound
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 21, 2006;
48(10):
2012 - 2025.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Yotti, J. Bermejo, M. M. Desco, J. C. Antoranz, J. L. Rojo-Alvarez, C. Cortina, C. Allue, H. Rodriguez-Abella, M. Moreno, and M. A. Garcia-Fernandez
Doppler-Derived Ejection Intraventricular Pressure Gradients Provide a Reliable Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Chamber Function
Circulation,
September 20, 2005;
112(12):
1771 - 1779.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. B. Popovic, U. N. Khot, G. M. Novaro, F. Casas, N. L. Greenberg, M. J. Garcia, G. S. Francis, and J. D. Thomas
Effects of sodium nitroprusside in aortic stenosis associated with severe heart failure: pressure-volume loop analysis using a numerical model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
January 1, 2005;
288(1):
H416 - H423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Schenk, Z. B. Popovic, Y. Ochiai, F. Casas, P. M. McCarthy, R. C. Starling, M. W. Kopcak Jr., R. Dessoffy, J. L. Navia, N. L. Greenberg, et al.
Preload-adjusted right ventricular maximal power: concept and validation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
October 1, 2004;
287(4):
H1632 - H1640.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Yotti, J. Bermejo, J. C. Antoranz, J. L. Rojo-Alvarez, C. Allue, J. Silva, M. M. Desco, M. Moreno, and M. A. Garcia-Fernandez
Noninvasive assessment of ejection intraventricular pressure gradients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 5, 2004;
43(9):
1654 - 1662.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|