|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1755-1760 © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |


* Division of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Manuscript received April 12, 2002; revised manuscript received June 14, 2002, accepted July 17, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Hiroshi Ito, Division of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan.
itomd{at}osk4.3web.ne.jp
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine which of the two main potential mechanisms underlying Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 2 (TIMI-2 flow) operate in an individual patient who has had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
BACKGROUND: Systolic flow reversal (SFR) is a specific finding of capillary damage, the no-reflow phenomenon. The coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV) pattern of thromboemboli, however, remains unknown.
METHODS: Data on 105 patients with AMI (57 with anterior and 48 with nonanterior cases) who underwent a coronary intervention were analyzed. The CBFV was recorded by a Doppler guide wire, and tissue perfusion was assessed with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE).
RESULTS: Study patients were classified into three groups according to TIMI grade and the presence or absence of SFR: 1) TIMI-3 flow (n = 80); 2) TIMI-2 flow with SFR (SFR[+], n = 14); and 3) TIMI-2 flow without SFR (SFR[-], n = 11). Diastolic CBFV was the lowest in SFR(-) (TIMI-3 vs. SFR[+] vs. SFR[-]: 34 vs. 31 vs. 9 cm/s), and the systolic to diastolic CBFV ratio was also the highest in SFR(-) (0.43 vs. 0.18 vs. 0.66). The no-reflow phenomenon documented by MCE was found in all patients in the SFR(+) group, but in only one patient (10%) in the SFR(-) group. Intracoronary thrombus was more frequently found in SFR(-) than in SFR(+) (91% vs. 14%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: At least two different CBFV patterns are noted in patients with reperfused AMI who have TIMI-2 flow. Capillary damage is mostly responsible for SFR(+), and SFR(-) is seen in thromboemboli possibly due to increased coronary arterial resistance.
| ||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Westerhof, C. Boer, R. R. Lamberts, and P. Sipkema Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature. Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1263 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A.E. Spaan, J. J. Piek, J. I.E. Hoffman, and M. Siebes Physiological Basis of Clinically Used Coronary Hemodynamic Indices Circulation, January 24, 2006; 113(3): 446 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Ohara, Y Hiasa, T Takahashi, K Yamaguchi, R Ogura, T Ogata, K Yuba, K Kusunoki, S Hosokawa, K Kishi, et al. Relation between the TIMI frame count and the degree of microvascular injury after primary coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Voci, F. Pizzuto, and F. Romeo Coronary flow: a new asset for the echo lab? Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1867 - 1879. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Voci, F. Pizzuto, and F. Romeo The slippery slope Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1480 - 1482. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul and H. Ito Microvasculature in Acute Myocardial Ischemia: Part II: Evolving Concepts in Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Circulation, January 27, 2004; 109(3): 310 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ito and K. Yamamoto Prognostic significance of coronary blood flow velocity patterns in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction and TIMI-2 flow: Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 2, 2003; 42(1): 182 - 183. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Garot Prognostic significance of coronary blood flow velocity patterns in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction and TIMI-2 flow J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 2, 2003; 42(1): 182 - 182. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |