Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:1261-1267
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elkayam, U
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elkayam, U
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S.

Renal hemodynamic effects of vasodilation with nifedipine and hydralazine in patients with heart failure

U Elkayam, L Weber, VM Campese, SG Massry, and SH Rahimtoola

The central and renal hemodynamic effects of nifedipine were evaluated in nine patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. Oral nifedipine (34 +/- 22 mg, mean +/- standard deviation) was associated with a decrease in systemic vascular resistance from 1,748 +/- 436 to 1,321 +/- 302 dynes . s . cm-5 (p less than 0.001) and mean arterial blood pressure from 96 +/- 11 to 87 +/- 6 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) and with an increase in cardiac output from 4.2 +/- 1.1 to 4.9 +/- 1.2 liters/min (p less than 0.001). Although renal vascular resistance decreased from 11,988 +/- 2,256 to 10,286 +/- 3,011 dynes . s . cm-5 (p less than 0.05), no significant change was seen in renal blood flow (599 +/- 120 to 640 +/- 162 ml/min), glomerular filtration rate (62 +/- 18 to 62 +/- 17 ml/min), filtration fraction (18 +/- 5 to 17 +/- 6%), the ratio of renal/systemic vascular resistance (7.0 +/- 1.0 to 7.9 +/- 1.8) and the ratio of renal blood flow/cardiac output (0.15 +/- 0.02 to 0.13 +/- 0.03). Intravenous hydralazine (10 +/- 5 mg), given to eight of the patients in a randomized crossover design, resulted in a larger increase in cardiac output than did nifedipine (38 +/- 7 versus 19 +/- 10%, p less than 0.001) and in an increase in total renal blood flow from 570 +/- 152 to 645 +/- 174 ml/min (p less than 0.001). Renal vascular resistance decreased from 12,080 +/- 2,934 to 10,153 +/- 2,372 dynes . s . cm-5 (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
U. Elkayam, A. Mehra, G. Cohen, P. P. Tummala, I. S. Karaalp, O. R. Wani, and M. Canetti
Renal circulatory effects of adenosine in patients with chronic heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1998; 32(1): 211 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. A. Johnson, R. L. Hamlin, and C. D. Lyons
Cardiovascular Effects of Nifedipine in the Dog
Angiology, October 1, 1993; 44(10): 791 - 796.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement