Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:1135-1147
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Blood pressure in survivors of myocardial infarction. The Coronary Drug Project Research Group

The prognostic significance of blood pressure elevation and its associated characteristics in patients recovered from myocardial infarction was studied in the placebo group (n = 2,789) of the Coronary Drug Project. Age, relative body weight, heart rate and ST depression on the electrocardiogram were important positive correlates of hypertension measured at baseline. The relation of uric acid and elevated plasma glucose levels to increased blood pressure could be partially explained as side effects of thiazide diuretic therapy. A "high normal" baseline blood pressure best predicted the development of hypertension among survivors of myocardial infarction. Both combined systolic and diastolic hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension were adverse prognostic factors. Changes in blood pressure, including the prognostic implications of a decrease in pressure, were also analyzed in the subset of patients who sustained a recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction. Decreases in systolic (mean 7.9 mm Hg) and diastolic (mean 3.6 mm Hg) blood pressure were sustained in this subset. Patients whose blood pressure decreased after recurrent myocardial infarction tended to have higher mortality rates than those of comparable patients whose blood pressure increased or remained unchanged.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. W. Haider, L. Chen, M. G. Larson, J. C. Evans, M. H. Chen, and D. Levy
Antecedent Hypertension Confers Increased Risk for Adverse Outcomes After Initial Myocardial Infarction
Hypertension, November 1, 1997; 30(5): 1020 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. C. Deedwania, E. A. Amsterdam, and R. H. Vagelos
Evidence-Based, Cost-effective Risk Stratification and Management After Myocardial Infarction
Arch Intern Med, February 10, 1997; 157(3): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. Farnett, C. D. Mulrow, W. D. Linn, C. R. Lucey, and M. R. Tuley
The J-Curve Phenomenon and the Treatment of Hypertension: Is There a Point Beyond Which Pressure Reduction Is Dangerous?
JAMA, January 23, 1991; 265(4): 489 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement