JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:765-770
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hohn, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Hohn, A.

Stress testing for comparison of synthetic patch aortoplasty with resection and end to end anastomosis for repair of coarctation in childhood

RT Smith Jr, RM Sade, DA Riopel, AB Taylor, FA Crawford Jr, and AR Hohn

Excellent clinical results have been achieved by both resection with end to end anastomosis and synthetic patch aortoplasty for the repair of coarctation of the aorta in older children. Increasing experience with exercise stress testing in the postoperative evaluation of patients with coarctation has allowed the discovery of less obvious differences between the two procedures. To evaluate these differences further, the stress tests of 50 postoperative patients who underwent coarctation repair were reviewed: 26 patients with end to end anastomosis and 24 with synthetic patch aortoplasty. Twenty normal control subjects were similarly exercised. Systolic blood pressure in the arm and leg was evaluated before and after the test. Heart rate, electrocardiogram and arm blood pressure were monitored during the test. The mean arm systolic blood pressure was higher at all points of measurement in the patients who underwent repair by end to end anastomosis than in the group who underwent patch aortoplasty. These systolic pressure differences reached statistical significance only for standing arm blood pressure before exercise (p less than 0.05) and for supine arm systolic blood pressure immediately after exercise (p less than 0.01). There was no difference in arm-leg pressure gradient between the two study groups before exercise; however, after exercise the group with end to end anastomosis had significantly higher arm-leg pressure gradients (p less than 0.001). Significant differences between the two types of repair not apparent at rest were found immediately after exercise. The long-term prognostic importance of an exercise-induced arm-leg blood pressure gradient remains to be determined. However, exercise stress testing is sensitive in demonstrating these differences.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.