Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:543-549
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yee, R
Right arrow Articles by Klein, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yee, R
Right arrow Articles by Klein, G.

Changes in pacing threshold and R wave amplitude after transvenous catheter countershock

R Yee, DL Jones, E Jarvis, AP Donner, and GJ Klein

Transvenous electrode catheter countershock in patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias may be followed by transient bradycardia and require temporary pacing with a catheter. The serial changes in R wave amplitude and stimulation threshold after catheter countershock in 11 halothane-anesthetized open chest dogs ranging in weight from 11.8 to 24 kg were studied. Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced and followed by catheter defibrillation using nonsynchronized trapezoidal waveform (65% tilt) current discharge in incremental doses (5 to 50 J). Significant decreases in bipolar R wave amplitude (8.3 +/- 1 versus 2 +/- 0.2 mV, p less than 0.001) and increases in stimulation threshold (1 +/- 0.1 versus 2.3 +/- 0.4 V, p less than 0.001) were observed using the countershock catheter 15 seconds after countershock; these changes persisted for up to 10 minutes. To determine whether these changes were localized to the defibrillating catheter and whether they were species-specific, a second electrode catheter was positioned in the right ventricle distant from the countershock catheter in five pigs. Increases in stimulation threshold were observed only at the countershock catheter, suggesting that changes were secondary to local changes at the catheter-myocardium interface. No significant change in R wave amplitude or stimulation threshold was observed at the countershock catheter in three pigs given transthoracic shocks (60 to 250 J). It is concluded that current discharge through the countershock catheter results in a significant temporary reduction in R wave amplitude and an increase in pacing threshold. This may make pacing through the countershock catheter unreliable after shock delivery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. H. Bardy, F. E. Marchlinski, A. D. Sharma, S. J. Worley, R. M. Luceri, R. Yee, B. D. Halperin, C. L. Fellows, T. S. Ahern, D. A. Chilson, et al.
Multicenter Comparison of Truncated Biphasic Shocks and Standard Damped Sine Wave Monophasic Shocks for Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation
Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2507 - 2514.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Natale, J. Sra, K. Axtell, M. Akhtar, K. Newby, V. Kent, M. J. Geiger, M. J. Brandon, M. M. Kearney, and A. Pacifico
Undetected Ventricular Fibrillation in Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators : Prospective Comparison of Different Lead System Device Combinations
Circulation, January 1, 1996; 93(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement