JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:529-534
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson,
Right arrow Articles by Weber, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, , JR
Right arrow Articles by Weber, K.

Effect of hydralazine on nutritive flow to working canine gracilis skeletal muscle

Wilson JR, RW Hoyt, N Ferraro, JS Janicki, and KT Weber

The direct smooth muscle vasodilator hydralazine has been used to treat exertional fatigue in patients with chronic heart failure. However, prior studies suggest that arteriolar vasodilators such as hydralazine may actually impair nutritive flow to working skeletal muscle by interfering with the distribution of blood flow within muscle. To investigate this possibility, tension development and metabolism were measured in nine vascularly isolated gracilis muscle preparations perfused at 90 mm Hg and stimulated to contract progressively at rates of 1, 3 and 6/s with each stage lasting 3 minutes. Studies were then repeated after 30 minutes of intraarterial hydralazine (0.02 to 0.12 mg/min). At rest, hydralazine decreased mean vascular resistance (+/- SEM) from 15.1 +/- 1.4 to 8.6 +/- 0.9 X 10(2) units (p less than 0.001) and increased blood flow from 6.4 +/- 0.7 to 11.4 +/- 1.2 ml/min (p less than 0.001), but did not change oxygen consumption (VO2) control, 18 +/- 1 versus hydralazine, 17 +/- 2 microliter/min). Hydralazine also decreased vascular resistance and increased flow at a contraction rate of 1/s, but not at 3 and 6/s. Hydralazine had no effect on maximal VO2 (control, 254 +/- 18 versus hydralazine, 236 +/- 19 microliter/min), maximal developed tension (control, 353 +/- 90 versus hydralazine, 334 +/- 74 kg X min) or the response in venous lactate (control, 20.6 +/- 2.3 versus hydralazine, 18.1 +/- 2.0 mg/dl). Hydralazine also did not change muscle metabolism and function at contraction rates of 1 and 3/s. These data suggest that hydralazine does not adversely affect nutritive flow to working skeletal muscle.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.