JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:316-323
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meijler, F.
Right arrow Articles by Borst, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meijler, F.
Right arrow Articles by Borst, C

Nonrandom ventricular rhythm in horses with atrial fibrillation and its significance for patients

FL Meijler, J Kroneman, I van der Tweel, JN Herbschleb, RM Heethaar, and C Borst

RR interval sequences during spontaneous atrial fibrillation in eight horses were analyzed as in previous studies in patients and dogs using histograms and serial auto-correlograms. In patients and dogs with spontaneous atrial fibrillation, ventricular rhythms were always random. In the horses, the histograms were skewed with median RR intervals of approximately 1,000 ms. A striking finding in these animals was the presence of long RR intervals up to 5,000 ms in duration. The shortest RR intervals lasted 400 to 600 ms. In contrast to findings in dogs and patients, the serial autocorrelograms showed periodicity that was reenforced by digitalis (n = 3), but eliminated by quinidine (n = 2) and atropine (n = 2). Quinidine and atropine eliminated the longer RR intervals, whereas digitalis increased the number of long RR intervals. In one horse, it was possible to measure intraarterial pressure, and large fluctuations in pressure were observed as the RR intervals varied from over 3,000 to less than 500 ms. It is postulated that these changes in blood pressure are associated with baroreceptor responses that may alter the electrophysiologic behavior of the atria and atrioventricular node. These changes cause the nonrandom patterns of ventricular rhythm in the horse. Because such very long RR intervals do not occur in human beings or dogs during atrial fibrillation, the random ventricular rhythm in these groups is maintained even during digitalis treatment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Bollmann, D. Husser, L. Mainardi, F. Lombardi, P. Langley, A. Murray, J. J. Rieta, J. Millet, S. B. Olsson, M. Stridh, et al.
Analysis of surface electrocardiograms in atrial fibrillation: techniques, research, and clinical applications.
Europace, November 1, 2006; 8(11): 911 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. M. Stein, J. Walden, N. Lippman, and B. B. Lerman
Ventricular response in atrial fibrillation: random or deterministic?
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1999; 277(2): H452 - H458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.