JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:141-148
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, W.
Right arrow Articles by Feigenbaum, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, W.
Right arrow Articles by Feigenbaum, H

Assessment of location and size of myocardial infarction with contrast-enhanced echocardiography. II. Application of digital imaging techniques

WF Armstrong, West SR, JC Dillon, and H Feigenbaum

Contrast echocardiography can be used to identify nonperfused regions of myocardium and localize and quantify infarcted myocardium. Analysis is usually undertaken by visual inspection of an analog two-dimensional echocardiographic image. The purpose of our study was to apply digital imaging techniques to contrast-enhanced echocardiograms for the determination of myocardial infarct size. Myocardial contrast was produced by an injection into the aortic root of a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and blood. Sixteen open chest dogs were studied 4 hours after coronary artery occlusion. Echocardiograms were evaluated by two independent observers. The results were compared with infarct location and size determined with nitro-blue tetrazolium staining of the corresponding slice of the left ventricle. Both the routine analog echocardiographic image and the digital subtraction image were analyzed. For the latter, three precontrast and three postcontrast echocardiographic enddiastolic fields were digitized in a 256 X 256 X 6 bit matrix and then averaged. Average pre- and postcontrast images were mathematically subtracted to form the digital subtraction image. There was excellent correlation between the percent of infarct determined with digital subtraction contrast echocardiography and results of nitro-blue tetrazolium staining (r = 0.97, SEE = 0.04, p less than 0.001). Using linear regression, the relation between infarct size by the two studies was best described by the equation DSI = 0.92 NBT + 0.03, where DSI = digital subtraction image and NBT = infarct size by nitro-blue tetrazolium. Inter- and intraobserver variability were also excellent (r = 0.93 and 0.96, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.