JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 4:1-7
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O.
Right arrow Articles by Krayenbuehl, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O.
Right arrow Articles by Krayenbuehl, H.

Pulsus alternans: its influence on systolic and diastolic function in aortic valve disease

OM Hess, EP Surber, M Ritter, and HP Krayenbuehl

Left ventricular high fidelity pressure measurements and simultaneous biplane cineangiocardiography were performed in 12 patients with severe aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis in 10, aortic insufficiency in 1 and combined valve lesion in 1). Left ventricular contractility was estimated from maximal rate of left ventricular pressure rise (max dP/dt), peak measured velocity of contractile element shortening (Vpm) and mean circumferential fiber shortening velocity. Left ventricular relaxation was assessed in 12 patients from the time constant (T) of the decline in left ventricular pressure; this constant was calculated from a nonlinear regression analysis of pressure and time (method 1) and a linear regression analysis of pressure and negative dP/dt (method 2). Left ventricular diastolic function was evaluated in nine patients from simultaneous diastolic pressure-volume relations during the strong and weak beats. During pulsus alternans, heart rate and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure remained unchanged, whereas peak systolic pressure (220 versus 204 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and end-systolic pressure (101 versus 95 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) were significantly higher during the strong beat than during the weak beat. Max dP/dt was alternating (2,162 versus 1,964 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), whereas the peak velocity of contractile element shortening remained unchanged (1.21 versus 1.18 ML/s). Systolic shortening of the left ventricular minor axis was significantly (p less than 0.02) greater during the strong (24%) than during the weak (19%) beat, but that of the left ventricular major axis remained essentially unchanged (8 versus 7%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. Babuty and M. J Lab
Mechanoelectric contributions to sudden cardiac death
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 270 - 279.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. E Euler
Cardiac alternans: mechanisms and pathophysiological significance
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 1999; 42(3): 583 - 590.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Kwan and A. Feit
Pseudo-alternans of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure: A Case Report
Angiology, August 1, 1995; 46(8): 739 - 742.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.