Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1546-1554
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lafitte, S. t.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lafitte, S. t.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Contrast echocardiography can assess risk area and infarct size during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: experimental validation

S. téphane Lafitte, MD*, Aya Higashiyama, MD*, Hisashi Masugata, MD*, Barry Peters, MD*, Monet Strachan, RDCS*, O. i Ling Kwan, RDCS* and Anthony N. DeMaria, MD, FACC*,*

* Cardiovascular Division, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA

Manuscript received July 11, 2001; revised manuscript received January 24, 2002, accepted February 5, 2002.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Anthony N. DeMaria, Cardiovascular Division, UCSD Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Street, San Diego, California 92103-8411 USA.
ademaria{at}ucsd.edu

OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate the ability of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) measures of opacification defect and contrast refilling parameters to estimate risk area (RA) and infarct area (IA) during coronary occlusion and reperfusion.

BACKGROUND: No data exist establishing the accuracy of MCE in determining RA and IA size. We hypothesized that in the setting of coronary occlusion, MCE should identify RA as a perfusion defect early after bubble destruction, collateral flow to viable myocardium as opacification late during refilling and IA as absent opacification.

METHODS: Three hours of coronary occlusion and reperfusion were each produced in 11 dogs in which real-time MCE was performed during intravenous infusion of Sonovue (Bracco). Real-time contrast echocardiography was performed at baseline, during occlusion and reperfusion. Early (BEGIN) and end (END) images from a FLASH refilling sequence were acquired, as well as late refilling images (LATE) 1 min after FLASH. Real-time contrast echocardiography defect size and quantitative refilling parameters were compared with RA and IA determined by tissue staining.

RESULTS: During occlusion, defect size varied with refilling time; defects from BEGIN images correlated best to RA and those from LATE images to IA. Refilling parameters, but not LATE peak intensity, did not predict the IA size during occlusion. During reperfusion, defects from BEGIN images were well correlated to RA and END images to IA, whereas peak plateau intensity and refilling slope parameters predicted IA size.

CONCLUSIONS: Real-time contrast echocardiography defect size varies throughout microbubble refilling. Appropriately selected defect sizes and refilling parameters provide estimates of RA and IA during coronary occlusion and reperfusion.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BEGIN
  beginning of the FLASH sequence
  CA
  control area
  END
  end of the FLASH sequence
  IA
  infarct area
  LATE
  late sequence
  MBF
  myocardial blood flow
  MCE
  myocardial contrast echocardiography
  RA
  risk area




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
R. Senior, H. Becher, M. Monaghan, L. Agati, J. Zamorano, J. L. Vanoverschelde, and P. Nihoyannopoulos
Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 194 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. Marcucci, R. Lauer, and A. Mahajan
New Echocardiographic Techniques for Evaluating Left Ventricular Myocardial Function
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 228 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
K. Masuda, T. Asanuma, A. Taniguchi, A. Uranishi, F. Ishikura, and S. Beppu
Assessment of dyssynchronous wall motion during acute myocardial ischemia using velocity vector imaging.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 210 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. A. Hayat and R. Senior
Myocardial contrast echocardiography in ST elevation myocardial infarction: ready for prime time?
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 299 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Dwivedi, R. Janardhanan, S. A. Hayat, J. M. Swinburn, and R. Senior
Prognostic Value of Myocardial Viability Detected by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 24, 2007; 50(4): 327 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. L. Gerber
Risk area, infarct size, and the exposure of the wavefront phenomenon of myocardial necrosis in humans
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2007; 28(14): 1670 - 1672.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. A. Dijkmans, R. Senior, H. Becher, T. R. Porter, K. Wei, C. A. Visser, and O. Kamp
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion: The Evidence So Far
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 5, 2006; 48(11): 2168 - 2177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
E. Toledo, L. D. Jacobs, J. A. Lodato, J. M. DeCara, P. Coon, V. Mor-Avi, and R. M. Lang
Quantitative diagnosis of stress-induced myocardial ischemia using analysis of contrast echocardiographic parametric perfusion images
Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2006; 7(3): 217 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-F. Paul, M. Wartski, C. Caussin, A. Sigal-Cinqualbre, B. Lancelin, C. Angel, and G. Dambrin
Late Defect on Delayed Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Scans in the Prediction of SPECT Infarct Size after Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction: Initial Experience
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 485 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
R Winter and R Willenheimer
The incremental value of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) as a bedside decision-making tool in the coronary care unit
Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2004; 5(2): 149 - 155.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Kunichika, O. Ben-Yehuda, S. Lafitte, N. Kunichika, B. Peters, and A. N. DeMaria
Effects of glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibition on microvascular flow after coronary reperfusion: A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
R Senior
Role of myocardial contrast echocardiography in the clinical evaluation of acute myocardial infarction
Heart, December 1, 2003; 89(12): 1398 - 1400.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Balcells, E. R. Powers, W. Lepper, T. Belcik, K. Wei, M. Ragosta, H. Samady, and J. R. Lindner
Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 5, 2003; 41(5): 827 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement