CLINICAL STUDY: HEART FAILURE
Left ventricular assist device therapy improves utilization of donor hearts
Keith D. Aaronson, MD, MS*,
Michael J. Eppinger, MD ,
David B. Dyke, MD*,
Susan Wright, BS, RN and
Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD, FACC ,*
* Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Manuscript received July 26, 2001;
revised manuscript received November 5, 2001,
accepted January 30, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Francis D. Pagani, Section of Cardiac Surgery, 2120 Taubman Center, Box 0348, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. fpagani{at}umich.edu
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the survival experiences of patients bridged to heart transplantation with either intravenous (IV) inotropes or an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
BACKGROUND: Because of the operative risks of LVAD implantation and the reported lower mortality associated with inotropic therapy, bridging to heart transplantation with inotropes is thought to be the preferred treatment option.
METHODS: Between April 1, 1996, and May 10, 2001, a total of 104 patients were bridged to heart transplantation with either IV inotropes (n = 38) or an implantable LVAD (n = 66; HeartMate). Survival was compared (Kaplan-Meier method) for three periods: survival to transplantation, post-transplantation survival and overall survival (i.e., survival from the onset of bridging to follow-up).
RESULTS: Survival to transplantation was 81 ± 5% at three months for the LVAD group and 64 ± 11% for the inotrope group (p = NS). Post-transplantation survival was 95 ± 4% at three years for the LVAD group (two deaths) and 65 ± 10% at three years for the inotrope group (nine deaths; p = 0.007). Overall survival was 77 ± 6% at three years for the LVAD group and 44 ± 9% at three years for the inotrope group (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival for patients who were bridged to heart transplantation with an implantable LVAD was superior to that of patients who were bridged with inotropes. Bridging to transplantation with an implantable LVAD improves utilization of donor hearts.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ECMO | | extracorporeal membrane oxygenation | | IV | | intravenous | | LVAD | | left ventricular assist device | | UNOS | | United Network for Organ Sharing | | VAD | | ventricular assist device | | VSD | | ventricular septal defect |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Struber, K. Sander, J. Lahpor, H. Ahn, P.-Y. Litzler, S. G. Drakos, F. Musumeci, C. Schlensak, I. Friedrich, R. Gustafsson, et al.
HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
August 1, 2008;
34(2):
289 - 294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Chapman, J. Parameshwar, D. Jenkins, S. Large, and S. Tsui
Psychosocial Issues for Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices: A Qualitative Pilot Study
Am. J. Crit. Care.,
January 1, 2007;
16(1):
72 - 81.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Clegg, D. A. Scott, E. Loveman, J. L. Colquitt, P. Royle, and J. Bryant
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation for people with end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation
Eur. Heart J.,
December 2, 2006;
27(24):
2929 - 2938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Felker and J. G. Rogers
Same Bridge, New Destinations: Rethinking Paradigms for Mechanical Cardiac Support in Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 7, 2006;
47(5):
930 - 932.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. V. Potapov, F. Hennig, F. D. Wagner, H.-D. Volk, R. Sodian, H. Hausmann, H. B. Lehmkuhl, and R. Hetzer
Natriuretic peptides and E-selectin as predictors of acute deterioration in patients with inotrope-dependent heart failure
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
May 1, 2005;
27(5):
899 - 905.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Casida
The Lived Experience of Spouses of Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device Before Heart Transplantation
Am. J. Crit. Care.,
March 1, 2005;
14(2):
145 - 151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gupta, V. Piacentino III, M. Macha, A. K. Singhal, J. P. Gaughan, J. B. McClurken, B. I. Goldman, C. A. Fisher, D. Beltramo, J. Monacchio, et al.
Effect of older donor age on risk for mortality after heart transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2004;
78(3):
890 - 899.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Gammie, L. B. Edwards, B. P. Griffith, R. N. Pierson III, and L. Tsao
Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation after ventricular assist device implantation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
June 1, 2004;
127(6):
1789 - 1799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Arribas, D. A. Pascual, F. Gutierrez, V. Ray, J. Garcia-Puente, M. Valdes, and R. Arcas
Successful biventricular assistance after heart transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
February 1, 2004;
77(2):
720 - 721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D R Wheeldon
Mechanical circulatory support: state of the art and future perspectives
Perfusion,
July 1, 2003;
18(4):
233 - 243.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Aaronson, H. Patel, and F. D. Pagani
Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
June 1, 2003;
75(90060):
S29 - 35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
LVADs Superior to IV Inotropic Therapy as a Bridge to Transplantation
Journal Watch Cardiology,
July 12, 2002;
2002(712):
4 - 4.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. McCarthy
Implantable left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplantation: natural selection, or is this the natural selection?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 17, 2002;
39(8):
1255 - 1257.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|