CLINICAL STUD: HEART FAILURE
Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Philip Jong, MD*,
Catherine Demers, MD, MSc ,
Robert S. McKelvie, MD, PhD and
Peter P. Liu, MD, FACC*,*
* Heart & Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence, Division of Cardiology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Division of Cardiology, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Manuscript received July 24, 2001;
revised manuscript received October 17, 2001,
accepted November 2, 2001.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Peter Liu, Heart & Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence, EN 12-324, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. peter.liu{at}utoronto.ca
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effect of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure (HF).
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding the efficacy of ARBs as substitute or adjunctive therapy to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in the treatment of HF.
METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that compared ARBs with either placebo or ACEIs in patients with symptomatic HF. The pooled outcomes were all-cause mortality and hospitalization for HF.
RESULTS: Seventeen trials involving 12,469 patients were included. Overall, ARBs were not superior to controls in the pooled rates of death (odds ratio: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 1.23) or hospitalization (0.86; 0.69 to 1.06). Stratified analysis, however, showed a non-significant trend in benefit of ARBs over placebo in reducing mortality (0.68; 0.38 to 1.22) and hospitalization (0.67; 0.29 to 1.51) when given in the absence of background ACEI therapy. When compared directly with ACEIs, ARBs were not superior in reducing either mortality (1.09; 0.92 to 1.29) or hospitalization (0.95; 0.80 to 1.13). In contrast, the combination therapy of ARBs and ACEIs was superior to ACEIs alone in reducing hospitalization (0.74; 0.64 to 0.86) but not mortality (1.04; 0.91 to 1.20).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis cannot confirm that ARBs are superior in reducing all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization in patients with symptomatic HF, particularly when compared with ACEIs. However, the use of ARBs as monotherapy in the absence of ACEIs or as combination therapy with ACEIs appears promising.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | OPTIMAAL | | ACEI | | angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor | | ADEPT | | Addition of the AT1 Receptor Antagonist Eprosartan to ACE Inhibitor Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure trial | | ARB | | angiotensin receptor blocker | | CHARM | | Candesartan in Heart FailureAssessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity trial | | CI | | confidence interval | | ELITE | | Evaluation of Losartan In The Elderly study | | HF | | heart failure | | NYHA | | New York Heart Association | | OPTIMAAL | | Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan trial | | OR | | odds ratio | | RESOLVD | | Randomized Evaluation of Strategies for Left Ventricular Dysfunction pilot study | | SPICE | | Study of Patients Intolerant of Converting Enzyme inhibitors | | STRETCH | | Symptom, Tolerability, Response to Exercise Trial of Candesartan cilexetil in Heart failure | | V-HeFT | | Vasodilator Heart Failure Trial | | Val-HeFT | | Valsartan Heart Failure Trial | | VALIANT | | Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gohler, A. Conrads-Frank, S. S. Worrell, B. P. Geisler, E. F. Halpern, R. Dietz, S. D. Anker, G. S. Gazelle, and U. Siebert
Decision-analytic evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of management programmes in chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail,
October 1, 2008;
10(10):
1026 - 1032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. O. Phillips, A. Kashani, D. K. Ko, G. Francis, and H. M. Krumholz
Adverse Effects of Combination Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers Plus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for Left Ventricular Dysfunction: A Quantitative Review of Data From Randomized Clinical Trials
Arch Intern Med,
October 8, 2007;
167(18):
1930 - 1936.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Lechat
The evolution of heart failure management over recent decades: from CONSENSUS to CIBIS
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
June 1, 2006;
8(suppl_C):
C5 - C12.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Lee, J. V. Tu, D. N. Juurlink, D. A. Alter, D. T. Ko, P. C. Austin, A. Chong, T. A. Stukel, D. Levy, and A. Laupacis
Risk-Treatment Mismatch in the Pharmacotherapy of Heart Failure
JAMA,
September 14, 2005;
294(10):
1240 - 1247.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Swedberg, Writing Committee:, J. Cleland, H. Dargie, H. Drexler, F. Follath, M. Komajda, L. Tavazzi, O. A. Smiseth, et al.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J.,
June 1, 2005;
26(11):
1115 - 1140.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Y Patwala and D J Wright
Device based treatment of heart failure
Postgrad. Med. J.,
May 1, 2005;
81(955):
286 - 291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. C. Lee, D. C. Rhew, and G. D. Braunstein
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers in Chronic Heart Failure
Ann Intern Med,
March 1, 2005;
142(5):
388 - 389.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, and P. P. Liu
Narrative Review: Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Evidence from Recent Clinical Trials
Ann Intern Med,
January 18, 2005;
142(2):
132 - 145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hannuksela, M. Leppilampi, K. Peuhkurinen, S. Karkkainen, E. Saastamoinen, T. Helio, M. Kaartinen, M. S. Nieminen, P. Nieminen, and S. Parkkila
Hereditary hemochromatosis gene (HFE) mutations C282Y, H63D and S65C in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Eur J Heart Fail,
January 1, 2005;
7(1):
103 - 108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. C. Lee, D. C. Rhew, M. Dylan, E. Badamgarav, G. D. Braunstein, and S. R. Weingarten
Meta-Analysis: Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers in Chronic Heart Failure and High-Risk Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ann Intern Med,
November 2, 2004;
141(9):
693 - 704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Gluckman, B. Baranowski, M. D. Ashen, C. A. Henrikson, M. McAllister, J. B. Braunstein, and R. S. Blumenthal
A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction
Arch Intern Med,
July 26, 2004;
164(14):
1490 - 1500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Rahimtoola
Digitalis Therapy for Patients in Clinical Heart Failure
Circulation,
June 22, 2004;
109(24):
2942 - 2946.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Manohar and I. L. Pina
Therapeutic Role of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in the Treatment of Heart Failure
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
March 1, 2003;
78(3):
334 - 338.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Soler-Soler and D. Garcia-Dorado
How to best to counteract the enemies? By blocking neurohormonal activation
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
November 1, 2002;
4(suppl_G):
G45 - G50.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W Kitzman
Review: angiotensin receptor blockers do not reduce mortality or hospital admission rates in heart failure
Evid. Based Med.,
September 1, 2002;
7(5):
141 - 141.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Fink
The Use of Angiotensin-II Receptor Blockers in Heart Failure
Journal of Pharmacy Practice,
August 1, 2002;
15(4):
318 - 325.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|