EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
Biphasic waveform external defibrillation thresholds for spontaneous ventricular fibrillation secondary to acute ischemia
Gregory P. Walcott, MD*,*,
Cheryl R. Killingsworth, MD, PhD*,
William M. Smith, PhD and
Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD, FACC*
* Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Physiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Manuscript received January 31, 2001;
revised manuscript received August 23, 2001,
accepted October 17, 2001.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gregory P. Walcott, Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, 1670 University Boulevard, B140 Volker Hall, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0019, USA. gpw{at}crml.uab.edu
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine if the defibrillation threshold (DFT) after spontaneous ventricular fibrillation (VF) secondary to acute ischemia differs from the DFT for electrically induced VF in the absence of ischemia in anesthetized, closed-chest dogs and pigs.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of external defibrillators has been tested mainly in animals and humans using E-VF, yet external defibrillators are often used in patients to halt S-VF.
METHODS: Protocol 1: biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform shocks were delivered through electrodes placed in an anterior-anterior (A-A) position (left and right lateral thorax) in nine dogs. After measuring the E-VF DFT, acute ischemia was induced with an angioplasty balloon in either the left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery, and the S-VF DFT was determined. Protocol 2: in a group of 12 pigs, the E-VF DFT and S-VF DFT were determined for electrodes in the A-A position and in the anterior-posterior position (A-P). Protocol 3: the E-VF DFT was determined in seven pigs. Then up to three shocks 1.5x the E-VF DFT were delivered to S-VF. If defibrillation did not occur, a step-up protocol was used until defibrillation occurred.
RESULTS: Protocol 1: the DFT for E-VF was 65 ± 28 J (mean ± SD) compared with 226 ± 97 J for S-VF, p < 0.05. Protocol 2: the DFT was 152 ± 58 J for E-VF and 315 ± 123 J for S-VF for A-A electrodes. The DFT was 100 ± 43 J for E-VF and 206 ± 114 J for S-VF for A-P electrodes. Protocol 3: 11/37 shocks of strength 1.5x E-VF DFT (182 ± 40 J) stopped the arrhythmia. The episodes of S-VF not halted by these shocks required energy levels of up to 400 J for defibrillation.
CONCLUSIONS: External defibrillation of S-VF induced by acute ischemia requires significantly more energy than VF induced by 60-Hz current in the absence of ischemia. A safety margin >1.5x the DFT for electrically induced VF may be necessary in BTE external defibrillators to defibrillate S-VF.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | A-A | | anterior-anterior | | A-P | | anterior-posterior | | BTE | | biphasic truncated exponential | | DFT | | defibrillation threshold | | ECG | | electrocardiogram | | LAD | | left anterior descending | | LCX | | left circumflex | | VF | | ventricular fibrillation |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Kudenchuk, L. A. Cobb, M. K. Copass, M. Olsufka, C. Maynard, and G. Nichol
Transthoracic Incremental Monophasic Versus Biphasic Defibrillation by Emergency Responders (TIMBER): A Randomized Comparison of Monophasic With Biphasic Waveform Ascending Energy Defibrillation for the Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest due to Ventricular Fibrillation
Circulation,
November 7, 2006;
114(19):
2010 - 2018.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Fang, W. Tang, S. Sun, L. Huang, Y.-T. Chang, Z. Huang, and M. H. Weil
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a rat model of chronic myocardial ischemia
J Appl Physiol,
October 1, 2006;
101(4):
1091 - 1096.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Rodriguez, B. M. Tice, J. C. Eason, F. Aguel, J. M. Ferrero Jr., and N. Trayanova
Effect of acute global ischemia on the upper limit of vulnerability: a simulation study
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
June 1, 2004;
286(6):
H2078 - H2088.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Sims, K. L. Schoff, J. M. Loeb, and N. A. Wiegert
Regional gap junction inhibition increases defibrillation thresholds
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
June 5, 2003;
285(1):
H10 - H16.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Zaitsev, P. K. Guha, F. Sarmast, A. Kolli, O. Berenfeld, A. M. Pertsov, J. R. de Groot, R. Coronel, and J. Jalife
Wavebreak Formation During Ventricular Fibrillation in the Isolated, Regionally Ischemic Pig Heart
Circ. Res.,
March 21, 2003;
92(5):
546 - 553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Qin, G. P. Walcott, C. R. Killingsworth, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Impact of Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion on Ventricular Defibrillation Patterns, Energy Requirements, and Detection of Recovery
Circulation,
May 28, 2002;
105(21):
2537 - 2542.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|