Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:315-322
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v39,p1409)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schall, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schall, R.

CLINICAL STUDY: HYPERTENSION

Evidence-based evaluation of calcium channel blockers for hypertension

Equality of mortality and cardiovascular risk relative to conventional therapy

Lionel H. Opie, MD, DPhil, DSc, FACC*,* and Robert Schall, PhD{dagger}

* Hatter Institute, Department of Medicine, Cape Heart Center, University of Cape Town Medical School, Cape Town, South Africa
{dagger} Quintiles ClinData, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Manuscript received May 7, 2001; revised manuscript received August 15, 2001, accepted October 19, 2001.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Lionel H. Opie, Cape Heart Center, University of Cape Town Medical School, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Opie{at}capeheart.uct.ac.za

OBJECTIVES: We present a meta-analysis based on three recent, substantial, randomized outcome trials and several smaller trials that compared calcium channel blockers (CCBs) with conventional therapy (diuretics or beta-blockers) or with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

BACKGROUND: There is continuing uncertainty about the safety and efficacy of CCBs in the treatment of hypertension. Previous meta-analyses conflict and suggest that CCBs increase myocardial infarction (MI) or protect from stroke.

METHODS: Standard procedures for meta-analysis were used to analyze three major trials on 21,611 patients and another three lesser studies to a total of 24,322 patients.

RESULTS: Calcium channel blockers have a strikingly similar risk of total and cardiovascular mortality and of major cardiovascular events to conventional therapy. Calcium channel blockers give a lower risk of nonfatal stroke (–25%, p = 0.001) and a higher risk of total MI (18%, p = 0.013), chiefly nonfatal (18%). After performing the Bonferroni correction for multiplicity, these p values become 0.004 and 0.052, respectively. When compared with ACE inhibitors in 1,318 diabetic patients, CCBs had a substantially higher risk of nonfatal (relative risk [RR] = 2.259) and total MI (RR = 2.204, confidence interval 1.501 to 3.238; p = 0.001 or 0.004 with Bonferroni correction). Total and cardiovascular mortality rates are similar. To confirm the hypothesis that ACE inhibitors are superior to CCBs in diabetic patients requires more trial data, especially with renal end points.

CONCLUSIONS: Mortality (total and cardiovascular) and major cardiovascular events with CCBs were apparently similar to those events seen with conventional first-line therapy (diuretics or beta-blockers). Stroke reduction more than balanced increased MI. In diabetics, CCBs may be less safe than ACE inhibitors.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ABCD
  Appropriate Blood pressure Control in Diabetes trial
  ACE
  angiotensin-converting enzyme
  CASTEL
  Cardiovascular Study of the Elderly
  CCB
  calcium channel blocker
  CI
  confidence interval
  FACET
  Fosinopril versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Trial
  MI
  myocardial infarction
  MIDAS
  Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study
  RR
  relative risk
  STOP-Hypertension
  Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
I. U. Park and A. L. Taylor
Race and Ethnicity in Trials of Antihypertensive Therapy to Prevent Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2007; 5(5): 444 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
F. Toraman, H. Karabulut, O. Goksel, S. Evrenkaya, S. Tarcan, and C. Alhan
Comparison of Antihypertensives after Coronary Artery Surgery
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2005; 13(4): 302 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Opie
Anti-ischemic properties of calcium-channel blockers: Lessons from cardiac surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1506 - 1509.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement