Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:266-273
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, D.

CLINICAL STUDY: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass

the VA AWESOME multicenter registry: comparison with the randomized clinical trial

Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385 the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME), Douglass A. Morrison, MD, FACC*,*, Gulshan Sethi, MD, FACC,*, Jerome Sacks, PhD,{dagger}, William Henderson, PhD,{dagger}, Frederick Grover, MD, FACC,{ddagger}, Steven Sedlis, MD, FACC,§, Rick Esposito, MD,§, Kodagundi B. Ramanathan, MD, FACC,||, Darryl Weiman, MD,||, J. David Talley, MD, FACC,, Jorge Saucedo, MD,, Tamim Antakli, MD,, Venki Paramesh, MD,*, Stuart Pett, MD,#, Sarah Vernon, MD, FACC,#, Vladimir Birjiniuk, MD,**, Frederick Welt, MD,**, Mitchell Krucoff, MD, FACC,{dagger}{dagger}, Walter Wolfe, MD, FACC,{dagger}{dagger}, John C. Lucke, MD,{ddagger}{ddagger}, Sundeep Mediratta, MD,{ddagger}{ddagger}, David Booth, MD, FACC,§§, Charles Barbiere, CCRN{ddagger}, Dan Lewis, MDFACC||||

* Tucson VA Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
{dagger} CSPCC Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA
{ddagger} Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
§ New York VA Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
|| Memphis VA Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Little Rock VA Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
# Albuquerque VA Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
** West Roxbury VA Medical Center, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Asheville VA Medical Center, Asheville, North Carolina, USA
§§ Lexington VA Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
|||| Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansis City, Kansas, USA

Manuscript received April 27, 2001; revised manuscript received September 25, 2001, accepted October 23, 2001.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Douglass A. Morrison, Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Tucson VAMC (111 C), Professor of Medicine and Radiology, University of Arizona SAVAHCS, 3601 S. Sixth Ave, Tucson, Arizona 85723 USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the three-year survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in physician-directed and patient-choice registries with the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME) randomized trial results.

BACKGROUND: The AWESOME multicenter randomized trial and registry compared the long-term survival after PCI and CABG for the treatment of patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one additional risk factor for adverse outcome with CABG. The randomized trial demonstrated comparable three-year survival.

METHODS: Over a five-year period (1995 to 2000), 2,431 patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one of five risk factors (prior heart surgery, myocardial infarction within seven days, left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35, age >70 years, intra-aortic balloon required to stabilize) were identified. By physician consensus, 1,650 patients formed a physician-directed registry assigned to CABG (692), PCI (651) or further medical therapy (307), and 781 were angiographically eligible for random allocation; 454 of these patients constitute the randomized trial, and the remaining 327 constitute a patient choice registry. Survival for CABG and PCI was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.

RESULTS: The CABG and PCI 36-month survival rates for randomized patients were 79% and 80%, respectively. The CABG and PCI 36-month survival rates were both 76% for the physician-directed subgroup; comparable survival rates for the patient-choice subgroup were 80% and 89%, respectively. None of the global log-rank tests for survival demonstrated significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS: Both registries support the randomized trial conclusion: PCI is an alternative to CABG for some medically refractory high-risk patients.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACC/AHA
  American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class of lesion grading
  AWESOME
  Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation
  CABG
  coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  CAD
  coronary artery disease
  IABP
  intra-aortic balloon pump
  LVEF
  left ventricular ejection fraction
  MI
  myocardial infarction
  NYHA
  New York Heart Association class of heart failure
  PCI
  percutaneous coronary intervention (may include stents or atherectomy, in addition or in place of balloon angioplasty only)
  SVG
  saphenous vein graft
  TIMI
  Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
  VA
  U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. H Wong, S. Wan, and M. J Underwood
Myocardial Revascularization: Surgery or Stenting?
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2007; 15(3): 264 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Radford
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention "Dominates" Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for High-Risk Patients: Good News for Patients, a Challenge for Healthcare Planners
Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1229 - 1231.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. T. Stroupe, D. A. Morrison, M. A. Hlatky, P. G. Barnett, L. Cao, C. Lyttle, D. M. Hynes, W. G. Henderson, and for the Investigators of Veterans Affairs Cooperat
Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Revascularization of High-Risk Patients
Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1251 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
O. Ben-Yehuda
Physician Judgment in Cardiology: The Art of Medicine Lives On
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 954 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. S. Lee, N. Kapoor, F. Jamal, L. Czer, J. Aragon, J. Forrester, S. Kar, S. Dohad, R. Kass, N. Eigler, et al.
Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 21, 2006; 47(4): 864 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. B. Ramanathan, D. S. Weiman, J. Sacks, D. A. Morrison, S. Sedlis, G. Sethi, and W. G. Henderson
Percutaneous Intervention Versus Coronary Bypass Surgery for Patients Older Than 70 Years of Age With High-Risk Unstable Angina
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1340 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. B. King III, G. Dangas, J. W. Moses, S. B. King III, G. Dangas, and J. W. Moses
Surgery Is Preferred for the Diabetic With Multivessel Disease
Circulation, September 6, 2005; 112(10): 1500 - 1515.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G W Mikhail, F Airoldi, D Tavano, A Chieffo, R Rogacka, M Carlino, M Montorfano, G Sangiorgi, N Corvaja, I Michev, et al.
The use of drug eluting stents in single and multivessel disease: results from a single centre experience
Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 990 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. A. Morrison, G. Sethi, J. Sacks, W. G. Henderson, F. Grover, S. Sedlis, R. Esposito, and Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affair
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat bypass surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia: AWESOME randomized trial and registry experience with post-CABG patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 4, 2002; 40(11): 1951 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. P. Sedlis, D. A. Morrison, J. D. Lorin, R. Esposito, G. Sethi, J. Sacks, W. Henderson, F. Grover, K. B. Ramanathan, D. Weiman, et al.
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2002; 40(9): 1555 - 1566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
PCI vs. CABG in High-Risk Patients
Journal Watch Cardiology, March 22, 2002; 2002(322): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement