REVIEW ARTICLE
Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal
Mandeep Singh, MD*,
Henry H. Ting, MD, FACC*,
Peter B. Berger, MD, FACC*,
Kirk N. Garratt, MD, FACC*,
David R. Holmes, Jr, MD, FACC* and
Bernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil*,*
* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Manuscript received September 27, 2001;
revised manuscript received March 19, 2002,
accepted April 1, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bernard J. Gersh, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Since the early 1990s, with significant improvement in the procedural success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), there has been a concomitant reduction in the need for emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This review article focuses on the need for on-site cardiac surgery in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty at centers without on-site cardiac surgical backup. It gives an overview of the need for emergency bypass surgery in both the large trial setting and the community hospital setting. Special consideration is also given to the risks and benefits of primary angioplasty compared with thrombolytic therapy, transfer to an institution with an on-site cardiac surgical facility compared with primary PCI, the frequency and indications for emergency cardiac surgery related and unrelated to primary angioplasty and the requirements for primary angioplasty that must be met in hospitals without the capability of on-site cardiac surgery.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ACC/AHA = American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association | | AMI = acute myocardial infarction | | CABG = coronary artery bypass graft surgery | | CI = confidence interval | | GUSTO = Global Use of Strategies To Open occluded arteries trial | | MITI = Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention registry | | MITRA = Maximal Individual TheRapy in Acute myocardial infarction registry | | NRMI = National Registry of Myocardial Infarction | | PAMI-2 = Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction-2 trial | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | RR = relative risk | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A de Belder
On-site surgical standby for percutaneous coronary intervention: a thing of the past?
Heart,
March 1, 2007;
93(3):
281 - 283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Carlsson, S. N James, E. Stahle, S. Hofer, and B. Lagerqvist
Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby
Heart,
March 1, 2007;
93(3):
335 - 338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Wilson, E. S. Fisher, H. G. Welch, A. E. Siewers, and F. L. Lucas
U.S. Trends In CABG Hospital Volume: The Effect Of Adding Cardiac Surgery Programs
Health Aff.,
January 1, 2007;
26(1):
162 - 168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Yang, R. J. Gumina, R. J. Lennon, D. R. Holmes Jr, C. S. Rihal, and M. Singh
Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Changes in the Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Indications From 1979 to 2003
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 6, 2005;
46(11):
2004 - 2009.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, C. L. Grines, T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, and C. L. Grines
The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty
Circulation,
November 29, 2005;
112(22):
3509 - 3534.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Gersh, G. W. Stone, H. D. White, and D. R. Holmes Jr
Pharmacological Facilitation of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is the Slope of the Curve the Shape of the Future?
JAMA,
February 23, 2005;
293(8):
979 - 986.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Keeley and C. L. Grines
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Every Patient with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: What Stands in the Way?
Ann Intern Med,
August 17, 2004;
141(4):
298 - 304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Antman and F. Van de Werf
Pharmacoinvasive Therapy: The Future of Treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Circulation,
June 1, 2004;
109(21):
2480 - 2486.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Keeley and C. L. Grines
Primary Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction
JAMA,
February 11, 2004;
291(6):
736 - 739.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Lotfi, K. Mackie, V. Dzavik, and P. H. Seidelin
Impact of delays to cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 4, 2004;
43(3):
337 - 342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Dehmer and D. S. Gantt
Coronary intervention at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: are we pushing the envelope too far?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 4, 2004;
43(3):
343 - 345.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|