|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1881-1889 © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Manuscript received September 27, 2001; revised manuscript received March 19, 2002, accepted April 1, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bernard J. Gersh, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Since the early 1990s, with significant improvement in the procedural success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), there has been a concomitant reduction in the need for emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This review article focuses on the need for on-site cardiac surgery in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty at centers without on-site cardiac surgical backup. It gives an overview of the need for emergency bypass surgery in both the large trial setting and the community hospital setting. Special consideration is also given to the risks and benefits of primary angioplasty compared with thrombolytic therapy, transfer to an institution with an on-site cardiac surgical facility compared with primary PCI, the frequency and indications for emergency cardiac surgery related and unrelated to primary angioplasty and the requirements for primary angioplasty that must be met in hospitals without the capability of on-site cardiac surgery.
| ||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A de Belder On-site surgical standby for percutaneous coronary intervention: a thing of the past? Heart, March 1, 2007; 93(3): 281 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Carlsson, S. N James, E. Stahle, S. Hofer, and B. Lagerqvist Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby Heart, March 1, 2007; 93(3): 335 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Wilson, E. S. Fisher, H. G. Welch, A. E. Siewers, and F. L. Lucas U.S. Trends In CABG Hospital Volume: The Effect Of Adding Cardiac Surgery Programs Health Aff., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 162 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Yang, R. J. Gumina, R. J. Lennon, D. R. Holmes Jr, C. S. Rihal, and M. Singh Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Changes in the Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Indications From 1979 to 2003 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2004 - 2009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, C. L. Grines, T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, and C. L. Grines The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22): 3509 - 3534. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Gersh, G. W. Stone, H. D. White, and D. R. Holmes Jr Pharmacological Facilitation of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is the Slope of the Curve the Shape of the Future? JAMA, February 23, 2005; 293(8): 979 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Keeley and C. L. Grines Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Every Patient with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: What Stands in the Way? Ann Intern Med, August 17, 2004; 141(4): 298 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Antman and F. Van de Werf Pharmacoinvasive Therapy: The Future of Treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2480 - 2486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Keeley and C. L. Grines Primary Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction JAMA, February 11, 2004; 291(6): 736 - 739. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lotfi, K. Mackie, V. Dzavik, and P. H. Seidelin Impact of delays to cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 337 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Dehmer and D. S. Gantt Coronary intervention at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: are we pushing the envelope too far? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 343 - 345. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |